I love Stevie
He is the bears bear
Mr Rangers. No surrender. WATP. Brits Out. Four lads had a dream. Royalist. No Voter. See no evil, hear no evil
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted about a minute ago
I love Stevie
He is the bears bear
Mr Rangers. No surrender. WATP. Brits Out. Four lads had a dream. Royalist. No Voter. See no evil, hear no evil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I voted Yes mate......ya typecasting khunt
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Is it even remotely possible, that because Celtic still have a building warrant pending, that Police Scotland have decided, two weeks before the game, that due to this, they are making the call now that they don't support an away allocation being given
I mean is that even within the realms of possibility, and is it something that you lot might even begin to start considering?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
You’re confusing our inability to meet obligations and stick to agreements that suit us financially in terms of continued level of sponsorship with those of Rangers.
Why on earth would we even consider doing this when all we have to do is stick by the rules in the full belief that Rangers under its current leadership will continue to fwck up on every conceivable measurable? It makes no sense.
Just look at the litany of “disasters” in the very recent past.
Ibrox being unusable
Exit from CL which we are informed was banked upon
Manager being told he has practically no funds after clearly being promised them
Manager given crazy extended contract for absolutely no need
Marketing manager
No CEO
The list goes on and any slip ups from Rangers, we were always going to pile in and try and make it worse. Why leave ourselves exposed if you think we are that devious?
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
Is it even remotely possible, that because Celtic still have a building warrant pending, that Police Scotland have decided, two weeks before the game, that due to this, they are making the call now that they don't support an away allocation being given
I mean is that even within the realms of possibility, and is it something that you lot might even begin to start considering?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
It’s not within the realms of any possibility at all. If it was, then that’s what rangers would have said.
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
The nets can’t go up until after our game on Sunday, so that’s why it’s still pending.
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The nets can’t go up until after our game on Sunday, so that’s why it’s still pending.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clueless
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 seconds ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's already been explained for you in simple words.
You're the bore's bore.
Rangers started the work on the Copland, and the building warrant and planning permission was still not issued.
Go figure.
If there was an issue with anything to do with Celtic not complying or being able to complete the works in time, that rangers statement would have absolutely stated it.
There’s not a chance that Celtic have done all the work they’ve done-starting in February-without knowing it would have been completed in time. The building warrant isn’t and won’t be a concern.
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 seconds ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's already been explained for you in simple words.
You're the bore's bore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really...that's all been explained
Where has it been explained that Celtic can put up the netting and use it for an old firm game when the building warrant application for it has not yet been approved?....odlr that Police Scotland would be comfortable with a game going ahead while that was the situation?
That's all been explained has it???
Where...where the fck has that all been explained?
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted less than a minute ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking on CL money to make significant signings? Everyone including Rangers fans
It's quite obvious to be honest. Not expecting CL money means not splashing out
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
which is why we have focused so much on reducing the wage bill. both in terms of our squad size and average wage.
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been in the press.
Please note the difference in the pre qualification tie rewards of £4m ish which was being banked upon and “going into the Champions League”, which wasn’t
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’re certain it will be approved, then you have no point.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven’t read my much earlier post on building warrant approval process. I don’t blame you is this has been going round and round for way too long now
I’ve actually lost what your point is other than simply refusing to acknowledge what’s happened.
We call all play the game of “irrefutable proof” flying in the face of common sense and lack of any cohesive counter argument.
It’s like “photos or it didn’t happen”. We tried that with lauders but unfortunately for us he sent us photos. I’m still scarred
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been in the press.
Please note the difference in the pre qualification tie rewards of £4m ish which was being banked upon and “going into the Champions League”, which wasn’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaaah you were talking about the EL parachute payment money and not the CL money!?
Why didnt you just say that?
And saying 'Its been in the press' is an acceptable answer now on here!? Hmmm....
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven’t read my much earlier post on building warrant approval process. I don’t blame you is this has been going round and round for way too long now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I'm sitting listening to all sorts ofud being flung at our board around the fact that no planning applications or building warrants have been applied for
If it's simply the case that all this can be done, it's pretty certain that it will be approved, and it can be left at pending by the time the game comes around at Ibrox, then wtf is the issue??
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been in the press.
Please note the difference in the pre qualification tie rewards of £4m ish which was being banked upon and “going into the Champions League”, which wasn’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaaah you were talking about the EL parachute payment money and not the CL money!?
Why didnt you just say that?
And saying 'Its been in the press' is an acceptable answer now on here!? Hmmm....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My mistake
How many more years do we need to qualify for Europa league to eventually bridge the financial gap to Celtic?
If we were to win the league should we inform the SPFL that we dont want that CL spot? gotta think of the financial long term game.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven’t read my much earlier post on building warrant approval process. I don’t blame you is this has been going round and round for way too long now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I'm sitting listening to all sorts ofud being flung at our board around the fact that no planning applications or building warrants have been applied for
If it's simply the case that all this can be done, it's pretty certain that it will be approved, and it can be left at pending by the time the game comes around at Ibrox, then wtf is the issue??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The issue is Rangers can’t even categorically confirm they will be back at Ibrox themselves and the lack of any start on the process gives the only remaining conclusion that the work won’t be completed in time. And they certainly won’t pay for it at Hampden for one game.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted less than a minute ago
How many more years do we need to qualify for Europa league to eventually bridge the financial gap to Celtic?
If we were to win the league should we inform the SPFL that we dont want that CL spot? gotta think of the financial long term game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CL money would be crucial surely? Better player sales will help but unless you get 3 or 4 mega beneficial transfers, that I’d think would take some considerable time.
Sign in if you want to comment
Rangers v Ross County
Page 27 of 45
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32
posted on 15/8/24
I love Stevie
He is the bears bear
Mr Rangers. No surrender. WATP. Brits Out. Four lads had a dream. Royalist. No Voter. See no evil, hear no evil
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted about a minute ago
I love Stevie
He is the bears bear
Mr Rangers. No surrender. WATP. Brits Out. Four lads had a dream. Royalist. No Voter. See no evil, hear no evil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I voted Yes mate......ya typecasting khunt
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
Is it even remotely possible, that because Celtic still have a building warrant pending, that Police Scotland have decided, two weeks before the game, that due to this, they are making the call now that they don't support an away allocation being given
I mean is that even within the realms of possibility, and is it something that you lot might even begin to start considering?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope.
You’re confusing our inability to meet obligations and stick to agreements that suit us financially in terms of continued level of sponsorship with those of Rangers.
Why on earth would we even consider doing this when all we have to do is stick by the rules in the full belief that Rangers under its current leadership will continue to fwck up on every conceivable measurable? It makes no sense.
Just look at the litany of “disasters” in the very recent past.
Ibrox being unusable
Exit from CL which we are informed was banked upon
Manager being told he has practically no funds after clearly being promised them
Manager given crazy extended contract for absolutely no need
Marketing manager
No CEO
The list goes on and any slip ups from Rangers, we were always going to pile in and try and make it worse. Why leave ourselves exposed if you think we are that devious?
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 minutes ago
Is it even remotely possible, that because Celtic still have a building warrant pending, that Police Scotland have decided, two weeks before the game, that due to this, they are making the call now that they don't support an away allocation being given
I mean is that even within the realms of possibility, and is it something that you lot might even begin to start considering?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No.
It’s not within the realms of any possibility at all. If it was, then that’s what rangers would have said.
posted on 15/8/24
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
posted on 15/8/24
The nets can’t go up until after our game on Sunday, so that’s why it’s still pending.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
The nets can’t go up until after our game on Sunday, so that’s why it’s still pending.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clueless
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 seconds ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's already been explained for you in simple words.
You're the bore's bore.
posted on 15/8/24
Rangers started the work on the Copland, and the building warrant and planning permission was still not issued.
Go figure.
If there was an issue with anything to do with Celtic not complying or being able to complete the works in time, that rangers statement would have absolutely stated it.
There’s not a chance that Celtic have done all the work they’ve done-starting in February-without knowing it would have been completed in time. The building warrant isn’t and won’t be a concern.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 seconds ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's already been explained for you in simple words.
You're the bore's bore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really...that's all been explained
Where has it been explained that Celtic can put up the netting and use it for an old firm game when the building warrant application for it has not yet been approved?....odlr that Police Scotland would be comfortable with a game going ahead while that was the situation?
That's all been explained has it???
Where...where the fck has that all been explained?
posted on 15/8/24
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted less than a minute ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Banking on CL money to make significant signings? Everyone including Rangers fans
It's quite obvious to be honest. Not expecting CL money means not splashing out
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
which is why we have focused so much on reducing the wage bill. both in terms of our squad size and average wage.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been in the press.
Please note the difference in the pre qualification tie rewards of £4m ish which was being banked upon and “going into the Champions League”, which wasn’t
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you’re certain it will be approved, then you have no point.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven’t read my much earlier post on building warrant approval process. I don’t blame you is this has been going round and round for way too long now
posted on 15/8/24
I’ve actually lost what your point is other than simply refusing to acknowledge what’s happened.
We call all play the game of “irrefutable proof” flying in the face of common sense and lack of any cohesive counter argument.
It’s like “photos or it didn’t happen”. We tried that with lauders but unfortunately for us he sent us photos. I’m still scarred
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been in the press.
Please note the difference in the pre qualification tie rewards of £4m ish which was being banked upon and “going into the Champions League”, which wasn’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaaah you were talking about the EL parachute payment money and not the CL money!?
Why didnt you just say that?
And saying 'Its been in the press' is an acceptable answer now on here!? Hmmm....
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven’t read my much earlier post on building warrant approval process. I don’t blame you is this has been going round and round for way too long now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I'm sitting listening to all sorts ofud being flung at our board around the fact that no planning applications or building warrants have been applied for
If it's simply the case that all this can be done, it's pretty certain that it will be approved, and it can be left at pending by the time the game comes around at Ibrox, then wtf is the issue??
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 4 minutes ago
Who is telling us Rangers were banking on CL league money btw?
Clement himself said the very opposite a couple of days ago ahead of the Kiev tie...
Clement said on potential European riches. "Going to the Champions League is not budgeted and that is the best way because some teams have done that in the past and they had really big financial problems out of that. We can’t do that, clearly."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s been in the press.
Please note the difference in the pre qualification tie rewards of £4m ish which was being banked upon and “going into the Champions League”, which wasn’t
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaaah you were talking about the EL parachute payment money and not the CL money!?
Why didnt you just say that?
And saying 'Its been in the press' is an acceptable answer now on here!? Hmmm....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My mistake
posted on 15/8/24
How many more years do we need to qualify for Europa league to eventually bridge the financial gap to Celtic?
If we were to win the league should we inform the SPFL that we dont want that CL spot? gotta think of the financial long term game.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 11 minutes ago
So Celtic don't still have a building warrant pending?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve already clearly explained this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've explained what the grounds are for approval etc......that's it
I have no doubts that Celtic building warrant for the netting will be approved....but that's not the point though is it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You obviously haven’t read my much earlier post on building warrant approval process. I don’t blame you is this has been going round and round for way too long now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I'm sitting listening to all sorts ofud being flung at our board around the fact that no planning applications or building warrants have been applied for
If it's simply the case that all this can be done, it's pretty certain that it will be approved, and it can be left at pending by the time the game comes around at Ibrox, then wtf is the issue??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The issue is Rangers can’t even categorically confirm they will be back at Ibrox themselves and the lack of any start on the process gives the only remaining conclusion that the work won’t be completed in time. And they certainly won’t pay for it at Hampden for one game.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted less than a minute ago
How many more years do we need to qualify for Europa league to eventually bridge the financial gap to Celtic?
If we were to win the league should we inform the SPFL that we dont want that CL spot? gotta think of the financial long term game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CL money would be crucial surely? Better player sales will help but unless you get 3 or 4 mega beneficial transfers, that I’d think would take some considerable time.
Page 27 of 45
28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32