comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted about a minute ago
It's not approved yet...can argue the case about formalities etc all you want.....it's not approved yet, and if it's not by the time the game comes round....away fans can't attend can they
Think I've made my point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You haven’t. The whole reason Rangers fans can’t attend CP is because of Rangers failings. There is no mention or otherwise of anything Celtic have done or are doing wrong that puts our home game in jeopardy regarding away fans safety. Absolutely nothing other than in your own imagination and head.
It really is a pathetic stance St3vie. I admire your Uber staunchness and I’m sure you’ll get FF points for deflection.
I’m usually the lone voice defending our board but ffs if they behaved like their counterparts at Ibrox I’d have run out of sharks to throw long ago.
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
Uber staunchness.....called reality
Rangers have made a clusterfck of getting Ibrox ready so far but there is nothing that 100% confirms the old firm at Ibrox can't be held with all the required after measures in place....nothing
For whatever reason, Celtic still have a building warrant sitting at pending for the netting they need to have installed to meet the terms of the agreement....whether that's down to GCC, Cleric themselves or whatever....that is the situation whether you like it or not
Fck all "staunch" about pointing out these simple facts
Celtic’s initial application was made in February for the building work needing done. That took 3 months for approval.
We’re in mid August, and rangers haven’t made any application yet for the building work.
But aye, you hang your hat on a warrant that you’ve ’no doubt’ will be granted as being the reason.
You’re not a bot, but you’re not genuine either.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted about a minute ago
Celtic’s initial application was made in February for the building work needing done. That took 3 months for approval.
We’re in mid August, and rangers haven’t made any application yet for the building work.
But aye, you hang your hat on a warrant that you’ve ’no doubt’ will be granted as being the reason.
You’re not a bot, but you’re not genuine either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't me that was putting forward the argument that having a warrant sitting at pending wouldn't be an issue coz the chances of it failing were extremely slim
If it takes 3 months to get approval....the new year game is 3 and a half months away
I'm not hanging my hat on any reasons...just pointing out the facts and you are foaming at the mooth at the thought that something related to Celtic Park not being ready might actually have a hand in why these ticket allocations are not being given
You also came out with some pi$h about the warrant still sitting at pending coz you've got a game at the weekend and the nets couldn't go up until after it so away ye go POV
Only person foaming at anything is you, mate. Everyone else that’s engaged with you has been perfectly calm, reasonable and logical. You’re firing spurious reasons as to why this might not be to do with rangers, defying your own logic at the same time.
There’s loads of reasons why that warrant status hasn’t been issued-none of them are to do with Celtic though, and there’s no reason for it being held up. After this weekend when we initially would have needed to sort out any nets, you know that status would change. It’s not needed now though as by your own admission, timescales for rangers getting their own issues sorted are too tight for them to guarantee it.
Froth away, my good friend.
It’s us Stevie
Just call them smelly bograts
We’ll always have that
"There’s loads of reasons why that warrant status hasn’t been issued-none of them are to do with Celtic though"
Do I care?
Your still spouting utter garbage
There is absolutely nothing stopping you putting the netting in place, the question is over whether you can use it while a game is on
The fact that ticket allocations for the September game are being decided now is the issue ...Celtic may not have got the assurances they wanted for the January game, that may well be the case....but if Celtic are sitting with a building warrant pending, and cannot give assurances that it will be approved in time for the netting to be approved....it's the same fcking thing my friend...and whether that's Celtics fault, GCCs fault, the bloody face painter we didnt pays fault.....I do not give a $hit....it's not in anyway "spurious" to say it could also have been a factor in the decision making
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fooking Dhick Knowles
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we ever discuss football?
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we ever discuss football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is this ball of foot you speak of?
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we ever discuss football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of season - close season - marching season - transfer season - start of season - shambles season - building season - next shambles season - Euro qualies season - 3 shambles in one day season - first derby season - pumped in Europe season - banger season - poppy season - manager sacking season - drinking season - 2nd derby season - transfer season - biscuit tin season - gym season (short) - split season
I missed the LCF season cos I've no fooking idea when it is these days
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fooking Dhick Knowles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that even mean?
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 34 minutes ago
It’s us Stevie
Just call them smelly bograts
We’ll always have that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Us”.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fooking Dhick Knowles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that even mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nick Knowles the presenter/builder guy.
A building obsessed snorefest.
Your him but also a dhick.
So Dhick Knowles but you've repelled the insult by making me explain it, i think you knew who he was.
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye you're always a model of grace and decorum..
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye you're always a model of grace and decorum..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is wonderful. I must really get under your skin.
Carry on
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye you're always a model of grace and decorum..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair when he was at school they were still teaching in Latin
I admit my school also taught in when I wa sin 1st and 2nd year. I chose it for Standard Grade but the one remaining Latin teacher retired that year!
Indeed. Latin was my 8th subject. I could converse with doctors and dead Romans
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
Indeed. Latin was my 8th subject. I could converse with doctors and dead Romans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Romanes eunt domus"
"It means Romans Go Home"
"No it doesn't. Conjugate the second verb..."
Only a very few schools had a Russian teacher - mine had two
Sign in if you want to comment
Rangers v Ross County
Page 29 of 45
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted about a minute ago
It's not approved yet...can argue the case about formalities etc all you want.....it's not approved yet, and if it's not by the time the game comes round....away fans can't attend can they
Think I've made my point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. You haven’t. The whole reason Rangers fans can’t attend CP is because of Rangers failings. There is no mention or otherwise of anything Celtic have done or are doing wrong that puts our home game in jeopardy regarding away fans safety. Absolutely nothing other than in your own imagination and head.
It really is a pathetic stance St3vie. I admire your Uber staunchness and I’m sure you’ll get FF points for deflection.
I’m usually the lone voice defending our board but ffs if they behaved like their counterparts at Ibrox I’d have run out of sharks to throw long ago.
posted on 15/8/24
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
posted on 15/8/24
Uber staunchness.....called reality
Rangers have made a clusterfck of getting Ibrox ready so far but there is nothing that 100% confirms the old firm at Ibrox can't be held with all the required after measures in place....nothing
For whatever reason, Celtic still have a building warrant sitting at pending for the netting they need to have installed to meet the terms of the agreement....whether that's down to GCC, Cleric themselves or whatever....that is the situation whether you like it or not
Fck all "staunch" about pointing out these simple facts
posted on 15/8/24
Celtic’s initial application was made in February for the building work needing done. That took 3 months for approval.
We’re in mid August, and rangers haven’t made any application yet for the building work.
But aye, you hang your hat on a warrant that you’ve ’no doubt’ will be granted as being the reason.
You’re not a bot, but you’re not genuine either.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted about a minute ago
Celtic’s initial application was made in February for the building work needing done. That took 3 months for approval.
We’re in mid August, and rangers haven’t made any application yet for the building work.
But aye, you hang your hat on a warrant that you’ve ’no doubt’ will be granted as being the reason.
You’re not a bot, but you’re not genuine either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't me that was putting forward the argument that having a warrant sitting at pending wouldn't be an issue coz the chances of it failing were extremely slim
If it takes 3 months to get approval....the new year game is 3 and a half months away
I'm not hanging my hat on any reasons...just pointing out the facts and you are foaming at the mooth at the thought that something related to Celtic Park not being ready might actually have a hand in why these ticket allocations are not being given
You also came out with some pi$h about the warrant still sitting at pending coz you've got a game at the weekend and the nets couldn't go up until after it so away ye go POV
posted on 15/8/24
Only person foaming at anything is you, mate. Everyone else that’s engaged with you has been perfectly calm, reasonable and logical. You’re firing spurious reasons as to why this might not be to do with rangers, defying your own logic at the same time.
There’s loads of reasons why that warrant status hasn’t been issued-none of them are to do with Celtic though, and there’s no reason for it being held up. After this weekend when we initially would have needed to sort out any nets, you know that status would change. It’s not needed now though as by your own admission, timescales for rangers getting their own issues sorted are too tight for them to guarantee it.
Froth away, my good friend.
posted on 15/8/24
It’s us Stevie
Just call them smelly bograts
We’ll always have that
posted on 15/8/24
"There’s loads of reasons why that warrant status hasn’t been issued-none of them are to do with Celtic though"
Do I care?
Your still spouting utter garbage
There is absolutely nothing stopping you putting the netting in place, the question is over whether you can use it while a game is on
The fact that ticket allocations for the September game are being decided now is the issue ...Celtic may not have got the assurances they wanted for the January game, that may well be the case....but if Celtic are sitting with a building warrant pending, and cannot give assurances that it will be approved in time for the netting to be approved....it's the same fcking thing my friend...and whether that's Celtics fault, GCCs fault, the bloody face painter we didnt pays fault.....I do not give a $hit....it's not in anyway "spurious" to say it could also have been a factor in the decision making
posted on 15/8/24
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
posted on 15/8/24
Aye
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fooking Dhick Knowles
posted on 15/8/24
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we ever discuss football?
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we ever discuss football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is this ball of foot you speak of?
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
FFS is this still the building regs forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we ever discuss football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of season - close season - marching season - transfer season - start of season - shambles season - building season - next shambles season - Euro qualies season - 3 shambles in one day season - first derby season - pumped in Europe season - banger season - poppy season - manager sacking season - drinking season - 2nd derby season - transfer season - biscuit tin season - gym season (short) - split season
I missed the LCF season cos I've no fooking idea when it is these days
posted on 15/8/24
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fooking Dhick Knowles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that even mean?
posted on 15/8/24
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 34 minutes ago
It’s us Stevie
Just call them smelly bograts
We’ll always have that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“Us”.
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about a minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
It's.....not......approved
The game you need to have Celtic Park ready for is in two weeks
Where's the mentions or otherwise that we can't have Ibrox ready, have the new safety measures in place and just have a building warrant sitting at pending come new year...where the mention that this is unachievable?
The points been made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. Who says it’s not approved? Using your logic maybe sign off has been given and the files need updating. Typical bloody civil servants eh?
Rangers could not give assurances on their own ground. ffs, nobody knows when Ibrox will be ready do they? That’s what has enabled Celtic to call in the agreement clause of repricosity in (sp). No argument from Rangers.
You’re not making any points at all.
Right. Someone else’s turn to “chat” with St3vie as I’m tired now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's fooking Dhick Knowles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that even mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nick Knowles the presenter/builder guy.
A building obsessed snorefest.
Your him but also a dhick.
So Dhick Knowles but you've repelled the insult by making me explain it, i think you knew who he was.
posted on 15/8/24
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye you're always a model of grace and decorum..
posted on 15/8/24
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye you're always a model of grace and decorum..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is wonderful. I must really get under your skin.
Carry on
posted on 15/8/24
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 minutes ago
Oh it’s an insult.
No idea who he was but you chuckle away.
Don’t think I’ve ever called anyone a Dhick on here btw. Good to see you’ve added in the classic go to “h” just to enhance it. Some work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye you're always a model of grace and decorum..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair when he was at school they were still teaching in Latin
I admit my school also taught in when I wa sin 1st and 2nd year. I chose it for Standard Grade but the one remaining Latin teacher retired that year!
posted on 15/8/24
Indeed. Latin was my 8th subject. I could converse with doctors and dead Romans
posted on 15/8/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
Indeed. Latin was my 8th subject. I could converse with doctors and dead Romans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Romanes eunt domus"
"It means Romans Go Home"
"No it doesn't. Conjugate the second verb..."
posted on 15/8/24
Only a very few schools had a Russian teacher - mine had two
Page 29 of 45
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34