or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1112 comments are related to an article called:

Rangers v Ross County

Page 24 of 45

posted on 14/8/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted less than a minute ago
Yeah, that’s why we spent tens of thousands to accommodate your fans-just to then make sure our fans couldn’t go to the reverse fixture.

Seriously, man. Take a night off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Talk about twisting stuff mate ffs

You made plans to accommodate us then revoked on it for as yet unknown reasons
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No-we completed our plans to accommodate your fans.

Your club hasn’t even started the process to accommodate ours, and can’t apparently guarantee that’ll be done in time.

I think there might be an issue with Bennett’s timeline for being back at Ibrox…

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 14/8/24

"Your club hasn’t even started the process to accommodate ours, and can’t apparently guarantee that’ll be done in time."

Where has this been communicated, officially, by anyone?

Answer that and we might get somewhere

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 14/8/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 minute ago
"Your club hasn’t even started the process to accommodate ours, and can’t apparently guarantee that’ll be done in time."

Where has this been communicated, officially, by anyone?

Answer that and we might get somewhere
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, just like your new marketing guy the Rangers fans worked it out for themselves. No planning / building warrant applied for which is public domain.

posted on 14/8/24

See if you look out your window and see it’s raining, do you need to go outside and drown before you believe it’s actually true?

If what I said wasn’t the case, rangers would be shouting it from the rooftops. Instead, you’ve released that powder puff statement to placate the easily pleased amongst your support.

What benefit is there to Celtic in spending the time and money to get the ground ready as agreed, and then deny your fans access knowing it’ll mean our fans won’t get into the reciprocal game?!

Apply some logic instead of hiding behind ‘well, until there’s something official…’

And what makes you think that anything that comes from a boardroom is 100% true anyway?!

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 14/8/24

I'd like to hear the official line from Celtic is all, it's pretty simple.......and I'd like to know if any timelines had been settled on in relation to this agreement given Rangers have until January to get Ibrox ready for an old firm


I did also notice that Celtic's building warrant to have temporary netting installed and taken down before and after the old firm games is still pending, and thought this could possibly have something to do with it

https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/scottishBuildingWarrantDetails.do?previousCaseType=Property&keyVal=SBA6KVEXFTM00&previousCaseNumber=00CMW2EXDT000&previousCaseUprn=906700191127&activeTab=summary&previousKeyVal=00L0LREXDT000

So as said.....again.....I'd rather wait and hear the official word

posted on 14/8/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 7 minutes ago
There's the statement issued....no Rangers fans at Celtic Park in September

Beyond a fcking joke this carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's daft

Anyone know where it began?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't give a $hit how it started, it needs to stop....Celtic keep peddling this safety crap
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is your stadium going to be ready for the match?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know do I...but if it isn't and we are still at Hampden, you were happy to play us there in the cup final so.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At least your stadium should be ready for your next Champions League match

comment by St3vie (U11028)

posted on 14/8/24

comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 7 minutes ago
There's the statement issued....no Rangers fans at Celtic Park in September

Beyond a fcking joke this carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's daft

Anyone know where it began?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't give a $hit how it started, it needs to stop....Celtic keep peddling this safety crap
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is your stadium going to be ready for the match?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know do I...but if it isn't and we are still at Hampden, you were happy to play us there in the cup final so.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At least your stadium should be ready for your next Champions League match
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that meant to hurt

posted on 14/8/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 7 minutes ago
There's the statement issued....no Rangers fans at Celtic Park in September

Beyond a fcking joke this carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's daft

Anyone know where it began?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't give a $hit how it started, it needs to stop....Celtic keep peddling this safety crap
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is your stadium going to be ready for the match?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know do I...but if it isn't and we are still at Hampden, you were happy to play us there in the cup final so.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At least your stadium should be ready for your next Champions League match
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that meant to hurt
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 14/8/24

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 7 minutes ago
There's the statement issued....no Rangers fans at Celtic Park in September

Beyond a fcking joke this carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's daft

Anyone know where it began?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't give a $hit how it started, it needs to stop....Celtic keep peddling this safety crap
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is your stadium going to be ready for the match?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know do I...but if it isn't and we are still at Hampden, you were happy to play us there in the cup final so.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you ever stop and think before you type?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 15/8/24

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 5 hours, 17 minutes ago
I'd like to hear the official line from Celtic is all, it's pretty simple.......and I'd like to know if any timelines had been settled on in relation to this agreement given Rangers have until January to get Ibrox ready for an old firm


I did also notice that Celtic's building warrant to have temporary netting installed and taken down before and after the old firm games is still pending, and thought this could possibly have something to do with it

https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/scottishBuildingWarrantDetails.do?previousCaseType=Property&keyVal=SBA6KVEXFTM00&previousCaseNumber=00CMW2EXDT000&previousCaseUprn=906700191127&activeTab=summary&previousKeyVal=00L0LREXDT000

So as said.....again.....I'd rather wait and hear the official word
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll give you that one though it has at least been lodged - pun intended. However, if you’d clicked through you’d see amongst the related docs the granted planning for the new external security arrangements. Celtic say they are complete, no reason to doubt, along with the net.

The whole planning system is gubbed btw. I know developers and architects tearing their hair out. Months of post covid backlog fuelled by council cutbacks and work from home scheite. Laugh if you will but Celtic will have contacts to gcc to get stuff through. They won’t get the pre-season safety certificate without joined up local gov.

Bottom line work is getting done on verbals (with risk) whilst planning system admin catches up. There’s tight timescales for application & submission else you time out and have to start again - money making racket imho. The councils are out of control on approvals. I know, I’ve been through it. The important bit of building warrant is up front and not the end admin. I once revisited a 15yo submission to re-open it to get approved cos my house developer never filed the completion certificate on my house. I’ve timed out on another because detailed plans were not submitted in time.

Anyhow, this is just boardroom power games. Celtic won’t allow your club to get the upper hand on anything If they can help it. Not that it takes much effort. You too have suffered from massive downsizing in staff and letting experience walk out the door. You don’t have a ceo ffs. In return your fans are desperate to win a battle of any kind on or off the park. Bennett keeps reminding us he’s a fan so I wouldn’t put it past him to renege o an agreement though this will have been simmering since the Copeland fck up and won’t be new news to him. He’s out his depth.

Your prerogative to wait and see.

posted on 15/8/24

See if you look out your window and see it’s raining, do you need to go outside and drown before you believe it’s actually true?
=============



who goes outside and drowns in the rain?

posted on 15/8/24

Not so.

Building warrants can be granted during works in Scotland. You don’t have to wait for approval before commencing installation.

Furthermore; building control will depend solely on the safety kpi’s required for temporary netting structures and will have the only affect on such works as they perform no other function other than being a dividing safety barrier.

The other criteria will be base upon the installation methods and site risk assessments.

These aren’t habitable, retail or commercial works and as such there are very few if any legislative concerns that would apply here.

Planning permission is an entirely separate requirement but again it is unlikely to even be required as it is a temporary screen inside and existing structure. A simple letter from the relevant planning authority will be more than sufficient.

Now you know all that; don’t you even question why Rangers haven’t even started the process as it is very straightforward?

Only conclusions being that they believe they will not be back at Ibrox by the New year or they simply haven’t got the finances or can be bothered.

Then again, maybe they just forgot and thought they could get away with it. Rangers know what they (haven’t) done, but that won’t be the public announcement as we can see. Just blame someone else is the mantra. No wonder the whole thing is such a bumbling mess.

Get a decent CEO in and one who hasn’t worked with Celtic before, because there doesn’t appear to be anybody competent within the building as it stands.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 3 minutes ago
See if you look out your window and see it’s raining, do you need to go outside and drown before you believe it’s actually true?
=============



who goes outside and drowns in the rain?
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Was using it to show the extremity needed before Stevie believes anything.

Although, turns out after heat, lightning and rip currents, drowning in the rain is the next highest fatality due to weather/natural phenomenon.

posted on 15/8/24

amazing

i get celtics point on this, tickets need to go out in the next few days surely. If rangers cant guarantee that we will have tickets for ibrox then fine, but surely we would then just get them for hampden if they are still there.

alternatively, if we could trust each other, celtic could give tickets for this and if rangers cant at new year then we would get them for the last one and rangers wouldnt for the third match.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 50 minutes ago
Not so.

Building warrants can be granted during works in Scotland. You don’t have to wait for approval before commencing installation.

Furthermore; building control will depend solely on the safety kpi’s required for temporary netting structures and will have the only affect on such works as they perform no other function other than being a dividing safety barrier.

The other criteria will be base upon the installation methods and site risk assessments.

These aren’t habitable, retail or commercial works and as such there are very few if any legislative concerns that would apply here.

Planning permission is an entirely separate requirement but again it is unlikely to even be required as it is a temporary screen inside and existing structure. A simple letter from the relevant planning authority will be more than sufficient.

Now you know all that; don’t you even question why Rangers haven’t even started the process as it is very straightforward?

Only conclusions being that they believe they will not be back at Ibrox by the New year or they simply haven’t got the finances or can be bothered.

Then again, maybe they just forgot and thought they could get away with it. Rangers know what they (haven’t) done, but that won’t be the public announcement as we can see. Just blame someone else is the mantra. No wonder the whole thing is such a bumbling mess.

Get a decent CEO in and one who hasn’t worked with Celtic before, because there doesn’t appear to be anybody competent within the building as it stands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

sounds like they are severely lacking a competent project manager.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 15/8/24

Let's not kid ourselves that Lawwell is loving this as a deflection from signings too.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by JFK - Super Nintendo Chalmers (U8919)
posted 29 minutes ago
amazing

i get celtics point on this, tickets need to go out in the next few days surely. If rangers cant guarantee that we will have tickets for ibrox then fine, but surely we would then just get them for hampden if they are still there.

alternatively, if we could trust each other, celtic could give tickets for this and if rangers cant at new year then we would get them for the last one and rangers wouldnt for the third match.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hampden would probably need some work to safely accommodate a visiting support of that size. Nobody is paying for that just for two matches.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
Let's not kid ourselves that Lawwell is loving this as a deflection from signings too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He’s not involved in signings but it’s fairly clear his presence and undoubtedly his set criteria severely restricts our scouting team

Hang on. Scouting team…..

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 15/8/24

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
Let's not kid ourselves that Lawwell is loving this as a deflection from signings too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He’s not involved in signings but it’s fairly clear his presence and undoubtedly his set criteria severely restricts our scouting team

Hang on. Scouting team…..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicholson knows the score and be reading his raised eyebrows, pursed lips and wry nods and getting the message.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by Zico - Celtic Double Winners 23/24 (U21900)
posted 15 hours, 39 minutes ago
Ranging that Rangers are in the Europa League, they'll get loads more cash than us now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What good is a warchest full to the brim when the key is stashed.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about 2 hours ago
Not so.

Building warrants can be granted during works in Scotland. You don’t have to wait for approval before commencing installation.

Furthermore; building control will depend solely on the safety kpi’s required for temporary netting structures and will have the only affect on such works as they perform no other function other than being a dividing safety barrier.

The other criteria will be base upon the installation methods and site risk assessments.

These aren’t habitable, retail or commercial works and as such there are very few if any legislative concerns that would apply here.

Planning permission is an entirely separate requirement but again it is unlikely to even be required as it is a temporary screen inside and existing structure. A simple letter from the relevant planning authority will be more than sufficient.

Now you know all that; don’t you even question why Rangers haven’t even started the process as it is very straightforward?

Only conclusions being that they believe they will not be back at Ibrox by the New year or they simply haven’t got the finances or can be bothered.

Then again, maybe they just forgot and thought they could get away with it. Rangers know what they (haven’t) done, but that won’t be the public announcement as we can see. Just blame someone else is the mantra. No wonder the whole thing is such a bumbling mess.

Get a decent CEO in and one who hasn’t worked with Celtic before, because there doesn’t appear to be anybody competent within the building as it stands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a boring bastirt you are.

Got about 2 paragraphs in and was thrilled at the thought of watching paint dry instead.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about 2 hours ago
Not so.

Building warrants can be granted during works in Scotland. You don’t have to wait for approval before commencing installation.

Furthermore; building control will depend solely on the safety kpi’s required for temporary netting structures and will have the only affect on such works as they perform no other function other than being a dividing safety barrier.

The other criteria will be base upon the installation methods and site risk assessments.

These aren’t habitable, retail or commercial works and as such there are very few if any legislative concerns that would apply here.

Planning permission is an entirely separate requirement but again it is unlikely to even be required as it is a temporary screen inside and existing structure. A simple letter from the relevant planning authority will be more than sufficient.

Now you know all that; don’t you even question why Rangers haven’t even started the process as it is very straightforward?

Only conclusions being that they believe they will not be back at Ibrox by the New year or they simply haven’t got the finances or can be bothered.

Then again, maybe they just forgot and thought they could get away with it. Rangers know what they (haven’t) done, but that won’t be the public announcement as we can see. Just blame someone else is the mantra. No wonder the whole thing is such a bumbling mess.

Get a decent CEO in and one who hasn’t worked with Celtic before, because there doesn’t appear to be anybody competent within the building as it stands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a boring bastirt you are.

Got about 2 paragraphs in and was thrilled at the thought of watching paint dry instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some meltdoon this.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about 2 hours ago
Not so.

Building warrants can be granted during works in Scotland. You don’t have to wait for approval before commencing installation.

Furthermore; building control will depend solely on the safety kpi’s required for temporary netting structures and will have the only affect on such works as they perform no other function other than being a dividing safety barrier.

The other criteria will be base upon the installation methods and site risk assessments.

These aren’t habitable, retail or commercial works and as such there are very few if any legislative concerns that would apply here.

Planning permission is an entirely separate requirement but again it is unlikely to even be required as it is a temporary screen inside and existing structure. A simple letter from the relevant planning authority will be more than sufficient.

Now you know all that; don’t you even question why Rangers haven’t even started the process as it is very straightforward?

Only conclusions being that they believe they will not be back at Ibrox by the New year or they simply haven’t got the finances or can be bothered.

Then again, maybe they just forgot and thought they could get away with it. Rangers know what they (haven’t) done, but that won’t be the public announcement as we can see. Just blame someone else is the mantra. No wonder the whole thing is such a bumbling mess.

Get a decent CEO in and one who hasn’t worked with Celtic before, because there doesn’t appear to be anybody competent within the building as it stands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a boring bastirt you are.

Got about 2 paragraphs in and was thrilled at the thought of watching paint dry instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dearie me.

And you usually have so much to say in counter argument.

What a shame. Can only surmise that you agree completely with my points. And nobody for a second believes you only read two paragraphs.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
Let's not kid ourselves that Lawwell is loving this as a deflection from signings too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He’s not involved in signings but it’s fairly clear his presence and undoubtedly his set criteria severely restricts our scouting team

Hang on. Scouting team…..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicholson knows the score and be reading his raised eyebrows, pursed lips and wry nods and getting the message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If he’s even at his desk “chasing down” our targets

The signings in Idah and Schmeichel came from Rodgers. Says it all really.

posted on 15/8/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted about 2 hours ago
Not so.

Building warrants can be granted during works in Scotland. You don’t have to wait for approval before commencing installation.

Furthermore; building control will depend solely on the safety kpi’s required for temporary netting structures and will have the only affect on such works as they perform no other function other than being a dividing safety barrier.

The other criteria will be base upon the installation methods and site risk assessments.

These aren’t habitable, retail or commercial works and as such there are very few if any legislative concerns that would apply here.

Planning permission is an entirely separate requirement but again it is unlikely to even be required as it is a temporary screen inside and existing structure. A simple letter from the relevant planning authority will be more than sufficient.

Now you know all that; don’t you even question why Rangers haven’t even started the process as it is very straightforward?

Only conclusions being that they believe they will not be back at Ibrox by the New year or they simply haven’t got the finances or can be bothered.

Then again, maybe they just forgot and thought they could get away with it. Rangers know what they (haven’t) done, but that won’t be the public announcement as we can see. Just blame someone else is the mantra. No wonder the whole thing is such a bumbling mess.

Get a decent CEO in and one who hasn’t worked with Celtic before, because there doesn’t appear to be anybody competent within the building as it stands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a boring bastirt you are.

Got about 2 paragraphs in and was thrilled at the thought of watching paint dry instead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

books with pictures kind of guy?

why is carrot pubes trying to educate you so upsetting?

Page 24 of 45

Sign in if you want to comment