comment by Bobby (U4765)
posted 46 seconds ago

arab, go have a cup of tea and calm down dear.

..........................

Bobby

You are the one coming across as irate. I think you are even more dense than Redinthehead.

You haven't wummed me, however you have wummed yourself.

Did you say that reducing numbers of opposition fans due to safety concerns is something a small club does because they can't look after the supporters?

That is a wum statement, only it backfired on you.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
My whole point is highlighting the fact that if fans misbehave then what is the alternative?

..............

You have no evidence of fans misbehaving Billy. We just covered this.

What we do have evidence of is Liverpool acting like a small club. If they can not control away supporters at their ground, then they really should not allow them in.

Yet again, this seems to look very poor on behalf of what was once considered a great club.

RedBlackandWhiteside - Slightly different thing, most people would probably say that City are the strongest team in the league.

Wum statement that backfired from vidic chin

most people would probably say that City are the strongest team in the league.
****

they can, but they have won nothing yet. The best team will win. They always do.

Remember, it's not a sprint, it's a .

comment by Redinthehead -at least we didn't finish 13th (U1860)
posted 1 minute ago

You haven't wummed me, however you have wummed yourself.


...................

You do realise how utterly ridiculous that sounds?

Probably not, as you have shown more than once on this thread, you are not very clever.

As simple as Jedwood

How can you wum yourself?

comment by Redinthehead -at least we didn't finish 13th (U1860)

posted 3 minutes ago

You haven't wummed me, however you have wummed yourself.

Did you say that reducing numbers of opposition fans due to safety concerns is something a small club does because they can't look after the supporters?
--------------------------------------

I think having a building site is a bit different to not having the ability to steward the fans.

Probably not, as you have shown more than once on this thread, you are not very clever.
-----------
That's a real insult coming from VidicsChin.

Where is Jedwood?

comment by Redinthehead -at least we didn't finish 13th (U1860)
posted 2 minutes ago

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
My whole point is highlighting the fact that if fans misbehave then what is the alternative?

..............

You have no evidence of fans misbehaving Billy. We just covered this.

What we do have evidence of is Liverpool acting like a small club. If they can not control away supporters at their ground, then they really should not allow them in.

Yet again, this seems to look very poor on behalf of what was once considered a great club.

..........

What on earth is WUM about that?

1. Billy couldn't provide any evidence. Beleive me, if there were any Billy would have been all over it like an outbreak of pox.

2. There does appear to be evidence of Liverpool acting like a small club. If Liverpool, can not contol way fans, then don't let them in at all.

3. With regards to recent events at Anfield this is hardly going to win you back any good PR.

If you seriously think there is wumming going on there, then you really shouldn't be on a forum like this. it isn't for you.

Are you a softie? Did your mum make you wear shorts at school until you were fifteen?

comment by Bobby (U4765)
posted 8 minutes ago

Probably not, as you have shown more than once on this thread, you are not very clever.
-----------
That's a real insult coming from VidicsChin.

...............

It wasn't an insult, it was an observation.

2. There does appear to be evidence of Liverpool acting like a small club. If Liverpool, can not contol way fans, then don't let them in at all.
---------
This is a good idea, would it look bad on us if we didn't let any man u fans in at all? I think this would be the preferred option.

Are you a softie? Did your mum make you wear shorts at school until you were fifteen?

It wasn't an insult, it was an observation.
--------
Because observations can never be insulting.

comment by Bobby (U4765)
posted 12 seconds ago

It wasn't an insult, it was an observation.
--------
Because observations can never be insulting.

........................

I can only go by the evidence provided.

Bobby

Are United the only team who bring 6,000 away fans to Anfield?

is it Jedward?

shows how much I pay attention to them.

He's still as simple as.

Vidic you certainly are a plank.

If Liverpool fc's stewarding wasn't upto scratch it would certainly be highlighted by other authorities.

Liverpool fc made the full allocation available, this was reduced at a later date due to safety concerns made by the local council police etc.

A club doesn't just choose to reduce its ground capacity arbitrarily.

Small club indeed, if we were a small club why make a song and dance about a reduction in capacity?

Oh and vidic chin saying that man utd never stopped away fans from coming is a blatant untruth.. whatever the reason may have been, man utd did have a temporary ban on away fans at the stadium. Something you seemed absolutely ignorant of.

No idea VidicsChin, I'm an armchair fan, only been to 2 matches in my life, only one of those at Anfield.

comment by Redinthehead -at least we didn't finish 13th (U1860)
posted 46 seconds ago

Vidic you certainly are a plank.

If Liverpool fc's stewarding wasn't upto scratch it would certainly be highlighted by other authorities.

................

Then what is the issue?

There is no evidence of bad behavior from United fans at Anfield.

If your stewards can handle Everton supporters of the same number, how come they can not handle United fans.

Same goes for the Police.

Open your eyes and see how inconsistant this appears.

whatever the reason may have been, man utd did have a temporary ban on away fans at the stadium.

.....................

Prove it.