posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
I'm with Superb's media agenda on that one. I haven't noticed a bias against Chelsea specifically, but Steve Nichol is a joke of a pundit. Most of the ESPN panel are.
The idea pundit's are stuck in the past is a little generically thrown around, but in his case it's absolutely on the money.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Nicol is just upset he lost his gout medication
Absolute gammon
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Just from the highlights I can tell the game was fun.
Whatever happens results wise this season, I'll be so grateful to Marseca for fixing our curse for insomnia football if we can maintain this. Have zero expectations anymore so being entertained is enough to satisfy me.
I've only seen the Bournemouth game so far this season, which I've heard some say was our worst performance, and I even enjoyed that
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Cucurella was loving the applause he got when he was taken off. You can tell he’s been waiting for that for sometime. Crazy how he’s turned it around.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
Cucurella was loving the applause he got when he was taken off. You can tell he’s been waiting for that for sometime. Crazy how he’s turned it around.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably the most vilified player on here of all time in season one
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Personally I couldn't give a toss what Liverpool through and through Steve Nicol says about Chelsea. I've seen that guy criticise and moan about us for years. Definitely doesn't like us.
I also contest his statement that "If you like proper football, that was a joke". So all our excellent attacking players was a joke ? Certainly not how I saw it, I thought we were good in attack and probably could and should have scored more than four having had three goals disallowed.
We won despite some awful goalkeeping from Sanchez and players like Jaden Sancho are looking good as is our attack in general. GK and CB still needs addressing but it's very early days still. Lots of positives and things to build on and improve as well
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a good video exposing Rory Jennings for what he is lol.
https://youtu.be/keG7z7QH3Ys?si=ou-hQ7bO8QR2qV2x
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a good video exposing Rory Jennings for what he is lol.
https://youtu.be/keG7z7QH3Ys?si=ou-hQ7bO8QR2qV2x
--------------------------------------------------------
I've commented on that video
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a good video exposing Rory Jennings for what he is lol.
https://youtu.be/keG7z7QH3Ys?si=ou-hQ7bO8QR2qV2x
--------------------------------------------------------
I've commented on that video
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see it's getting traction. He's an utter 🔔 end isn't he.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
He's a character at this point. A caricature of himself for non-Chelsea fans to laugh at. He's basically DT between 2016-18 but on purpose
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Yeah that’s how Brighton play. We adapted well compared to that Spurs game last season. Created many openings and pressed really well forcing them into those mistakes. That was mostly their first choice back 5 as well.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is and was never the point.
Nicol said that the way both teams played defensively was embarrassing. Is he wrong?
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
CPL Forest thread
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/464073
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is and was never the point.
Nicol said that the way both teams played defensively was embarrassing. Is he wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we should differentiate between what Brighton did and what we did. Overall we were definitely the better side on the day and we won the game by two goals. Could have been more after having three goals disallowed as well.
If Brighton played a high line etc then that criticism needs to be levelled at their door, it's nothing to do with us. That's their performance which needs to be analysed separately.
And yes we made some mistakes defensively and weren't great in that area. This team is clearly learning still. Sanchez in particular probably needs dropping. Fofana's defending and marking was also very questionable and he'll need to improve to keep his place.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is and was never the point.
Nicol said that the way both teams played defensively was embarrassing. Is he wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we should differentiate between what Brighton did and what we did. Overall we were definitely the better side on the day and we won the game by two goals. Could have been more after having three goals disallowed as well.
If Brighton played a high line etc then that criticism needs to be levelled at their door, it's nothing to do with us. That's their performance which needs to be analysed separately.
And yes we made some mistakes defensively and weren't great in that area. This team is clearly learning still. Sanchez in particular probably needs dropping. Fofana's defending and marking was also very questionable and he'll need to improve to keep his place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No need to differentiate when it is clear both teams were defensively poor on the day.
You can debate which team was worse, and clearly that team was Brighton and the result could have or should have been 6 2.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Ok so Brighton were defensively worse than us and we won the game by a two goal margin even though it should have been more.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
I think the team need credit for coming back. We went 1-0 down and nearly went 2-0 down. In previous seasons we'd have usually folded at that point but we came back to win 4-2 and we probably should have scored another two or three. I'll take that all day long
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think the team need credit for coming back. We went 1-0 down and nearly went 2-0 down. In previous seasons we'd have usually folded at that point but we came back to win 4-2 and we probably should have scored another two or three. I'll take that all day long
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I won't take a defensive performance like that from us in any game. We do that agst better defensively organised sides than Brighton and more timee than not we will lose.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think the team need credit for coming back. We went 1-0 down and nearly went 2-0 down. In previous seasons we'd have usually folded at that point but we came back to win 4-2 and we probably should have scored another two or three. I'll take that all day long
-------------------------------------------------------
That was kind of my takeaway from the Bournemouth game.
Putting my armchair managers hat on, we probably should've made more of an effort to slow the game down cos Bournemouth were playing the high tempo better than us - we were playing their game & not the other way round. But I was impressed we kept going & did punish them when their battery ran flat. Good fitness & conviction on display there.
If we have played that game in 2019 w/Lampard when we were still at the top, I'd have had concerns about the immediate future. But in 2024 in the aftermath of all the new owners sh!t, I was encouraged by it
Sign in if you want to comment
The Haven
Page 61874 of 61922
61875 | 61876 | 61877 | 61878 | 61879
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
I'm with Superb's media agenda on that one. I haven't noticed a bias against Chelsea specifically, but Steve Nichol is a joke of a pundit. Most of the ESPN panel are.
The idea pundit's are stuck in the past is a little generically thrown around, but in his case it's absolutely on the money.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Nicol is just upset he lost his gout medication
Absolute gammon
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Just from the highlights I can tell the game was fun.
Whatever happens results wise this season, I'll be so grateful to Marseca for fixing our curse for insomnia football if we can maintain this. Have zero expectations anymore so being entertained is enough to satisfy me.
I've only seen the Bournemouth game so far this season, which I've heard some say was our worst performance, and I even enjoyed that
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Cucurella was loving the applause he got when he was taken off. You can tell he’s been waiting for that for sometime. Crazy how he’s turned it around.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
Cucurella was loving the applause he got when he was taken off. You can tell he’s been waiting for that for sometime. Crazy how he’s turned it around.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was probably the most vilified player on here of all time in season one
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Personally I couldn't give a toss what Liverpool through and through Steve Nicol says about Chelsea. I've seen that guy criticise and moan about us for years. Definitely doesn't like us.
I also contest his statement that "If you like proper football, that was a joke". So all our excellent attacking players was a joke ? Certainly not how I saw it, I thought we were good in attack and probably could and should have scored more than four having had three goals disallowed.
We won despite some awful goalkeeping from Sanchez and players like Jaden Sancho are looking good as is our attack in general. GK and CB still needs addressing but it's very early days still. Lots of positives and things to build on and improve as well
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a good video exposing Rory Jennings for what he is lol.
https://youtu.be/keG7z7QH3Ys?si=ou-hQ7bO8QR2qV2x
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a good video exposing Rory Jennings for what he is lol.
https://youtu.be/keG7z7QH3Ys?si=ou-hQ7bO8QR2qV2x
--------------------------------------------------------
I've commented on that video
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by MonTT (U22775)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 27 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you Rory jennings?
--------------------------------------------------
We'd know if Rory was on this or any other forum, that false pomposity is undeniable.
There's a very small chance he might be CMF if they had different agendas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a good video exposing Rory Jennings for what he is lol.
https://youtu.be/keG7z7QH3Ys?si=ou-hQ7bO8QR2qV2x
--------------------------------------------------------
I've commented on that video
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good to see it's getting traction. He's an utter 🔔 end isn't he.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
He's a character at this point. A caricature of himself for non-Chelsea fans to laugh at. He's basically DT between 2016-18 but on purpose
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Yeah that’s how Brighton play. We adapted well compared to that Spurs game last season. Created many openings and pressed really well forcing them into those mistakes. That was mostly their first choice back 5 as well.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is and was never the point.
Nicol said that the way both teams played defensively was embarrassing. Is he wrong?
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
CPL Forest thread
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/464073
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is and was never the point.
Nicol said that the way both teams played defensively was embarrassing. Is he wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we should differentiate between what Brighton did and what we did. Overall we were definitely the better side on the day and we won the game by two goals. Could have been more after having three goals disallowed as well.
If Brighton played a high line etc then that criticism needs to be levelled at their door, it's nothing to do with us. That's their performance which needs to be analysed separately.
And yes we made some mistakes defensively and weren't great in that area. This team is clearly learning still. Sanchez in particular probably needs dropping. Fofana's defending and marking was also very questionable and he'll need to improve to keep his place.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Superb - Chelsea Chelsea !! (U6486)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 36 minutes ago
In this case though he isn't wrong. The two goals that we conceded were pure pantomime and Brighton were equally accommodating with their high line and slow defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The game was filled with mistakes but we did play some very good attacking football.
Brighton’s first loss of the season as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one here can seriously disagree that the defending was either awful or suicidal.
Brighton playing a high line agst our attack and with their second choice defenders was brutally exposed early on yet they didn't change it.
They made Ange look lime Simeone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How Brighton played and the tactics they deployed is on them. Nothing to do with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is and was never the point.
Nicol said that the way both teams played defensively was embarrassing. Is he wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we should differentiate between what Brighton did and what we did. Overall we were definitely the better side on the day and we won the game by two goals. Could have been more after having three goals disallowed as well.
If Brighton played a high line etc then that criticism needs to be levelled at their door, it's nothing to do with us. That's their performance which needs to be analysed separately.
And yes we made some mistakes defensively and weren't great in that area. This team is clearly learning still. Sanchez in particular probably needs dropping. Fofana's defending and marking was also very questionable and he'll need to improve to keep his place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No need to differentiate when it is clear both teams were defensively poor on the day.
You can debate which team was worse, and clearly that team was Brighton and the result could have or should have been 6 2.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
Ok so Brighton were defensively worse than us and we won the game by a two goal margin even though it should have been more.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
I think the team need credit for coming back. We went 1-0 down and nearly went 2-0 down. In previous seasons we'd have usually folded at that point but we came back to win 4-2 and we probably should have scored another two or three. I'll take that all day long
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think the team need credit for coming back. We went 1-0 down and nearly went 2-0 down. In previous seasons we'd have usually folded at that point but we came back to win 4-2 and we probably should have scored another two or three. I'll take that all day long
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I won't take a defensive performance like that from us in any game. We do that agst better defensively organised sides than Brighton and more timee than not we will lose.
posted 2 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 12 minutes ago
I think the team need credit for coming back. We went 1-0 down and nearly went 2-0 down. In previous seasons we'd have usually folded at that point but we came back to win 4-2 and we probably should have scored another two or three. I'll take that all day long
-------------------------------------------------------
That was kind of my takeaway from the Bournemouth game.
Putting my armchair managers hat on, we probably should've made more of an effort to slow the game down cos Bournemouth were playing the high tempo better than us - we were playing their game & not the other way round. But I was impressed we kept going & did punish them when their battery ran flat. Good fitness & conviction on display there.
If we have played that game in 2019 w/Lampard when we were still at the top, I'd have had concerns about the immediate future. But in 2024 in the aftermath of all the new owners sh!t, I was encouraged by it
Page 61874 of 61922
61875 | 61876 | 61877 | 61878 | 61879