I remember being a child and when I got angry, my teeth clenched and I wanted to bite something.

.......................................

Your mum must have had sore paps then.

comment by Alassmithandjones (U15157) posted 7 seconds ago
It doesn't matter it the act was provoked/not.

It does tho. When Defoe bit Mascherano,he'd been taken from behind (he doesn't enjoy it like Toor and Terminator). So even tho I don't agree with what he done,there was reasoning behind it. There was no such provocation from Branislav,which makes Suarez a fooking screwball.
----------------------------------------
There was a highlight reel of Ivanovic and Suarez getting little digs in at each other all game. Please refrain from talking absolute crap with every single comment you make. Jesus man.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584) posted 1 minute ago
I remember being a child and when I got angry, my teeth clenched and I wanted to bite something.

.......................................

Your mum must have had sore paps then.
--------------------------------------------
I'm not talking breastfeeding age, a little bit further on when I realised I had to share my toys.

Absolutely not. Suarez actions yesterday are mutually exclusive to the Evra case. PROVE it and everyone of us will hold our hands up and apologise. It is a sad state of affairs when you punish someone because they "probably" did something, possibly, maybe.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

With a rap sheet as long as your arm detailing stamping, punching etc etc

see...

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/191367

liverpool fans still think evra lied about his incident with suarez.. Because it wasnt conclusively caught on camera...

I'm not talking breastfeeding age, a little bit further on when I realised I had to share my toys.

................

Oh, last week.

Evra did lie, how much of it was a lie, we don't know. He lied about how many times it was said, that's a fact.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584) posted 8 seconds ago
I'm not talking breastfeeding age, a little bit further on when I realised I had to share my toys.

................

Oh, last week.
---------------------------------
No last week I was breastfeeding on your Mrs.

Evra is a liar and Suarez is a closeted cannibal

well, I guess he's coming out a bit now

Suarez (cannibals are people too....you are what you eat afterall)

Evra liar booooooo

There was a highlight reel of Ivanovic and Suarez getting little digs

That happens every single game, you're clutching straws. Even ex reds said it was unprovoked.

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584) posted 8 seconds ago
I'm not talking breastfeeding age, a little bit further on when I realised I had to share my toys.

................

Oh, last week.
---------------------------------
No last week I was breastfeeding on your Mrs.

.............................

TOOR

I can assure you that my Mrs isn't your mum.

comment by Alassmithandjones (U15157) posted 7 seconds ago
There was a highlight reel of Ivanovic and Suarez getting little digs

That happens every single game, you're clutching straws. Even ex reds said it was unprovoked.
-----------------------------------
Whether it happens every match or not is irrelevant, you said it was unprovoked, which it wasn't, which is why I disagreed. You've been on the Liverpool board all day talking absolute crap. Wind it in,y you're pathetic. How old are you anyhow? I'm getting the crazy thought that you're closer to forty than twelve and yet, you don't act it. I'll begin to treat you like a child if you keep acting like one little buddy.

comment by Vidicschin (U3584) posted 36 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584) posted 8 seconds ago
I'm not talking breastfeeding age, a little bit further on when I realised I had to share my toys.

................

Oh, last week.
---------------------------------
No last week I was breastfeeding on your Mrs.

.............................

TOOR

I can assure you that my Mrs isn't your mum.
-----------------------------------------
Yeah but she likes to call me Big Daddy.

Comment deleted by Article Creator

I'm taking away your ball and you're not getting it back until you behave young man.

Comment deleted by Article Creator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

{honestlivpool~five~times}

"Not for a moral judge to decide how bad and if it would lead to contract termination." This isn't what I am saying, which is probably why you don't understand my point. That, and your previous statement of winning a football match is all that matters, and behaviour doesn't come into it shows you lack morals so it will be harder for you to grasp . I'll try to break it down for you:


1. A. Footballer is found guilty of rape & given a suspended sentance. He is the star of A. Club FC

2. This action is deemed as a fundamental breach of contract and the board weigh up the option to terminate the contract. They don't have to terminate his contract, it is just an option.

3a. A. Club FC know that terminating the contract will cost them £Xm in the resale value of their asset

3b. A. Club FC are in the play offs and need A. Footballer as he is the only fit striker, and the star of the show

3c. A. Club FC know that not terminating the contract will mitigate both of the above risks, but may harm their reputation

4. A. Club FC opt not to terminate the contract of A. Footballer

5. A. Club FC are subsequently judged by the fans and media for their decision to employ a rapist, and face massive backlash.

Now, it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to anticipate that step 5 would follow step 4. Ergo, the club take into consideration how damaging THEIR actions could be during the proceedings and do in fact consider their own morality at around step 2. The board do not want to appear immoral in their decision, nor do they want the decision to cost a fortune. Balancing morals (i.e. endearing yourself to the fan base) with the financial cost (i.e. how much money this costs) are two big factors.

If you fail to understand now, you have either never studied law or worked in it - or you are unsuccessful.

Yeah but she likes to call me Big Daddy.

............

Oh, you are a fat Yorkshire knacker named Shirley.

I will always think of you as a Shirley now, TOOR.

comment by Alassmithandjones (U15157) posted 3 minutes ago
It was unprovoked Toor,and you know it. Produce some evidence Toor to back up your theory, or are you conveniently going to say it unavailable like you did with the Osman goal.
-----------------------------------------
It was on MOTD last night. They showed a montage of Suarez and Ivanovic getting digs in at each other throughout the game. I've already told you this and quite frankly if you're too god damn lazy to look for things before spouting your absolute nonsense as you've been doing all day then I could give a flying f..k what you think and thus, I'll continue to delete your inane drivel.

Comment deleted by Article Creator

comment by Vidicschin (U3584) posted 1 minute ago
Yeah but she likes to call me Big Daddy.

............

Oh, you are a fat Yorkshire knacker named Shirley.

I will always think of you as a Shirley now, TOOR.
------------------------------------
Great. I said Big Daddy, Big Daddy!

So no Osman footage the Toor? Didn't Hansen say it was unprovoked?

From talkSPORT

Liverpool have turned down a bid for Suarez of 50m from....


Borussia Munchonacentreback

Alas, I have no idea what you're talking about with Osman. I don't know if Hansen said it was unprovoked, I don't remember nor tend to listen to pundits but it would be strange if he did considering he showed a montage of them going at it the who game with the last one him saying Ivanovic had a little kick at him there.

Come on Macca, that's so two hours ago.