There is no amount of provocation in football that justifies what suarez did.

Alas, I have no idea what you're talking about with Osman

You posted that Osman kicked the ground when he scored that worldy goal against City,and used Hoddle to back you up, but conveniently couldn't find the footage of him doing so.

"There is no amount of provocation in football that justifies what suarez did. "

there is if your name is Defoe though

Everyones acting like a ripped his arm off
it was a BITE a fecking BITE, i mean wtf its just really really weird, no damage done

comment by Alassmithandjones (U15157) posted 2 minutes ago
Alas, I have no idea what you're talking about with Osman

You posted that Osman kicked the ground when he scored that worldy goal against City,and used Hoddle to back you up, but conveniently couldn't find the footage of him doing so.
--------------------------------------
You I conveniently didn't find the footage of the reply in which Osman kicked the ground, which I posted on the article.

He kicked the ground, it was easy to see, get on with it ffs.

Back to work, cements arrived. I'll wipe the floor with you two later.

Nobody said there was justification in Suarez biting him, nobody, not one person, ever.

I know you'd love it if somebody did but nobody, ziltch.

comment by Alassmithandjones (U15157) posted 35 seconds ago
Back to work, cements arrived. I'll wipe the floor with you two later.
-------------------------------
Be careful not to fall into the mixer. Wouldn't want a statue of you.

Do people pretend we said we condone biting so they feel they can argue better?

Suso, they're absolutely fuming that we didn't condone it, so much so that they're actually saying that we have, just so they can run with their embarrassing Liverpool fans condoning such and such lines.

So why all the talk about proof of provocation. Bruising battles between defenders and forwards happen week in week out in football, but they dont culminate in players biting other players...

That happens every single game, you're clutching straws. Even ex reds said it was unprovoked.
=============================
It may well have been. Anything with human brain cell would know that a grown adult would have to be provoked to bite somebody else. You'd be either really stupid to think otherwise or just on the wind up.

3mustgetbeers
I find it ridiculous repeating myself again and again and again. I've already said it's put in the contract that the player would receive an automatic dismissal in the contract otherwise the player could challenge for excessive punishment. Without specifying what a particular breach of contract would lead to, you'd leave room for employer to abuse power/staff, which would lead prolong legal battle.

comment by blabla (U11635) posted 1 minute ago
So why all the talk about proof of provocation. Bruising battles between defenders and forwards happen week in week out in football, but they dont culminate in players biting other players...
-----------------------------
Because the moron above said there was no provocation.

Haha TOOR I only just heard it

http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/203040

This article is hilarious

What's this? Is Alas defending a player for biting an opponent?

After some of the shiite he's spouted since last night, I do hope not.

Yep, Alas keeps defending the bite, he condones it. He said otherwise but sure what does that matter? Let's just run with he condones it. It works for everybody else.

Suso

You write this

comment by Suso The Magician (U11770)
posted 17 minutes ago
Everyones acting like a ripped his arm off
it was a BITE a fecking BITE, i mean wtf its just really really weird, no damage done

Then 2 minutes later this?

comment by Suso The Magician (U11770)
posted 15 minutes ago
Do people pretend we said we condone biting so they feel they can argue better?

So you are saying Suarez wasnt provoked into biting Ivanovic...

comment by blabla (U11635) posted 11 seconds ago
So you are saying Suarez wasnt provoked into biting Ivanovic...
---------------------------
Who is? I haven't seen anybody saying that so I guess I can answer on the behalf of everybody. On this article at least.

So are you saying he was provoked into BITING suarez ?

Sorry provoked into BITING Ivanovic...?

comment by blabla (U11635) posted 59 seconds ago
So are you saying he was provoked into BITING suarez ?
--------------------------------
Yeah he was provoked but like has been said, players are provoked every game. Ivanovic was provoked throughout by Suarez, yet he didn't bite Suarez. There had to be something really wrong with Suarez mentally for him to stick his teeth in. That's not normal.

Are you saying he wasn't provoked, he just decided to bite him?

Think about who looks the most crazy here. The person saying Suarez randomly decided to bite somebody or the person after seeing the montage of little digs two players were having at each other, meant he was provoked. Take your time.

He MUST have been. Unless Suarez is kind of an or something from Mars.

Comment deleted by Article Creator