The F1 season begins on 13th Mar 2015.

N_six0six (U13776) has run rings around MA but can n606 raise to the challenge and keep it up until then?

McLaren's input to Honda has gone from “fairly substantial” to “snippets”.

Are they substantial snippets?

I think N_six0six (U13776) can get MA to claim that the McLaren has “gossiped”.

Substantial gossip or snippet gossip or substantial snippet gossip.

comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
The F1 season begins on 13th Mar 2015.

N_six0six (U13776) has run rings around MA but can n606 raise to the challenge and keep it up until then?

McLaren's input to Honda has gone from “fairly substantial” to “snippets”.

Are they substantial snippets?

I think N_six0six (U13776) can get MA to claim that the McLaren has “gossiped”.

Substantial gossip or snippet gossip or substantial snippet gossip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

oh dear ----- usual load of nothing of substance

You would of course know a lot about no substance martial.

comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
You would of course know a lot about no substance martial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

hows the make believe oil executive portfolio today

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 21 hours, 49 minutes ago
Try again Martial.

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."

All I ever said. Keep up
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so now you do disagree with my opinion after agreeing with my opinion

Where is the oil executive?

Do you know what a portfolio means in the oil and gas industry?

Tragic state of affairs.

MA's mental illness enables him to live in his own world where everything to him is the opposite to reality. Therefore, when he declares that a comment has no substance then everyone else realises that it does.

comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 11 hours, 55 minutes ago
Where is the oil executive?

Do you know what a portfolio means in the oil and gas industry?

Tragic state of affairs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

go on -- ------ tell another little fairytale about being a top oil executive with a big portfolio that employs people -

--------------- that throws little tantrums when people dont agree with him on here

comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 8 hours, 41 minutes ago
MA's mental illness enables him to live in his own world where everything to him is the opposite to reality. Therefore, when he declares that a comment has no substance then everyone else realises that it does.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

oh fluck me --- " tangled up in lew " has crawled out from under its stone again

I have not said I am a oil executive, why tell lies about me?

I do employ people, like I said, a portfolio in oil and gas does not mean people.

I have posted logical coherent statements on here, you have brought in my job, my family, my kids and accuse me of throwing a tantrum. Told me you are rattling an imaginary cage of mine and called me a gutless coward but I am the one throwing tantrums

Do you know what a tantrum is? I posted a definition for you.

comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 27 minutes ago
I have not said I am a oil executive, why tell lies about me?

I do employ people, like I said, a portfolio in oil and gas does not mean people.

I have posted logical coherent statements on here, you have brought in my job, my family, my kids and accuse me of throwing a tantrum. Told me you are rattling an imaginary cage of mine and called me a gutless coward but I am the one throwing tantrums

Do you know what a tantrum is? I posted a definition for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

manx ------- i have told you mate stop with the unprovoked insults and the pathetic innuendo you aim at me on just about every topic and i wont rattle your cage -

basically i am offering you an olive branch as nobody wants to read anymore of this infantile garbage between us on here

You bring my kids, my family, background and my job into a debate about F1, call me names, accuse me of lying and then tell me you are offering me an olive branch?

You really are something special

comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 20 hours, 20 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 21 hours, 49 minutes ago
Try again Martial.

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."

All I ever said. Keep up
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so now you do disagree with my opinion after agreeing with my opinion


========================================

Two simple tasks,

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 20 hours, 20 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 21 hours, 49 minutes ago
Try again Martial.

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."

All I ever said. Keep up
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so now you do disagree with my opinion after agreeing with my opinion


========================================

Two simple tasks,

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days

----------------------------------------------------------------------

oh fluck me another little A and B question game when all else has failed -
---------------------------if you have not been disagreeing with me for the last few days what are we disagreeing about now then

comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 20 hours, 20 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 21 hours, 49 minutes ago
Try again Martial.

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."

All I ever said. Keep up
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so now you do disagree with my opinion after agreeing with my opinion


========================================

Two simple tasks,

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days

----------------------------------------------------------------------

oh fluck me another little A and B question game when all else has failed -
---------------------------if you have not been disagreeing with me for the last few days what are we disagreeing about now then


==========================================

Well unlike you Martial I've not been backed into a corner so am happy to oblige and answer simple questions. One has to wonder why you are so afraid of my simple questions?

We have been debating my point all along, the one which is quoted in the very post you have replied to
I have not debated any other F1 related things in this thread so I fail to see where the confusion is.

How about you, ready to answer the simple questions now?

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 20 hours, 20 minutes ago
comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 21 hours, 49 minutes ago
Try again Martial.

"I think theres a fairly major point being missed here. Regardless of whether McLaren passed information onto Honda or not they do not know how the Mercedes PU works. Yes they can see what the engine physically looks like but we all know that by now, it get snapped every Thursday at Grand Prix's.

Only Mercedes really knows whats going on inside and with the control units. Yes Honda can build a engine that 'looks' the same, but to build one that is the same, well that's another story. I feel this simple point has been somewhat ignored irrationally

Plus Honda-McLaren was announced in May 2013, so unless they threw away a years worth of work they won't have been entirely copying what the Merecedes lump 'looks' like."

All I ever said. Keep up
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so now you do disagree with my opinion after agreeing with my opinion


========================================

Two simple tasks,

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days

----------------------------------------------------------------------

oh fluck me another little A and B question game when all else has failed -
---------------------------if you have not been disagreeing with me for the last few days what are we disagreeing about now then


==========================================

Well unlike you Martial I've not been backed into a corner so am happy to oblige and answer simple questions. One has to wonder why you are so afraid of my simple questions?

We have been debating my point all along, the one which is quoted in the very post you have replied to
I have not debated any other F1 related things in this thread so I fail to see where the confusion is.

How about you, ready to answer the simple questions now?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

fluck me thats a long winded load of nothing nsix ,

----------- so basically you do now agree with me

That is desperate mate! A few sentences being 'long winded'. Perhaps this is all above your level

I answered your simple question, your turn. Try and win back some credibility!

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days


Need me to remind you what we were debating again?

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 23 seconds ago


That is desperate mate! A few sentences being 'long winded'. Perhaps this is all above your level

I answered your simple question, your turn. Try and win back some credibility!

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days


Need me to remind you what we were debating again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

so now you have never debated with me but you disagree with me when you have agreed with me -
----------- what a pickle you are in

I definitely debated with you martial, seems you're struggling at reading there!

See

"We have been debating my point all along, the one which is quoted in the very post you have replied to
I have not debated any other F1 related things in this thread so I fail to see where the confusion is."

Come now, what are you afraid of?

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days



Show some dignity

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 2 minutes ago
I definitely debated with you martial, seems you're struggling at reading there!

See

"We have been debating my point all along, the one which is quoted in the very post you have replied to
I have not debated any other F1 related things in this thread so I fail to see where the confusion is."

Come now, what are you afraid of?

A) Find me one example of me disagreeing with you about the thing I never debated with you

B) Tell me a single thing wrong with what I posted, which should be easy as you debated it with me for several days



Show some dignity


----------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------ so you agree with me and then you dont agree with me and then you do agree and then you dont and round and round we go talking bollox

Is this what you want Martial, night after night of you embarrassing yourself? Because I can keep this up as long as you want, no loss to me

We all know how you've backed yourself into a corner, I even offered you a olive branch to go find where I disagreed with 'your' point but you refused.

You spent days debating 'my' point with me and now you've decided to run away like a 'gutless coward'.

All you had to do was admit you were either debating to be facetious or you were simply mistaken. Instead you are just digging a deeper hole showing less and less maturity.

Only harming you mate, your call

Take this olive branch or throw it in my face, only harms you.

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 10 minutes ago
Is this what you want Martial, night after night of you embarrassing yourself? Because I can keep this up as long as you want, no loss to me

We all know how you've backed yourself into a corner, I even offered you a olive branch to go find where I disagreed with 'your' point but you refused.

You spent days debating 'my' point with me and now you've decided to run away like a 'gutless coward'.

All you had to do was admit you were either debating to be facetious or you were simply mistaken. Instead you are just digging a deeper hole showing less and less maturity.

Only harming you mate, your call

Take this olive branch or throw it in my face, only harms you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

oh dear --- not starting to lose it are you nsix -

how do expect me to respond to you on here when all you want to do is play silly little ego games all the time -

you either agree with me or you dont
--------------------- " your call "

Well I'm not going to lie mate, I fully expected you to throw my olive branch in my face. Didn't really think you had it in you to take the mature option

Not sure what a ego game is, I can only assume another desperate attempt to dig yourself out of your ever deepening hole.

How do I know whether I disagree with you or not Martial, you've not even said what I should be disagreeing about

If you're talking about what you and I debated about for several nights on this thread then we disagree. If it's the thing I never debated with you then it's probably safe to assume I agreed

This is utterly pathetic, do you really think you can dig yourself out of this, you can't even admit what you've been debating about with me, need me to tell you for a 8th time?

I've offered you a way out, a olive branch, and you threw it in my face like a little angry toddler.

Sums you up sorry to say

comment by N_six0six (U13776)
posted 3 minutes ago
Well I'm not going to lie mate, I fully expected you to throw my olive branch in my face. Didn't really think you had it in you to take the mature option

Not sure what a ego game is, I can only assume another desperate attempt to dig yourself out of your ever deepening hole.

How do I know whether I disagree with you or not Martial, you've not even said what I should be disagreeing about

If you're talking about what you and I debated about for several nights on this thread then we disagree. If it's the thing I never debated with you then it's probably safe to assume I agreed

This is utterly pathetic, do you really think you can dig yourself out of this, you can't even admit what you've been debating about with me, need me to tell you for a 8th time?

I've offered you a way out, a olive branch, and you threw it in my face like a little angry toddler.

Sums you up sorry to say

----------------------------------------------------------------------
dear dear me ---- another long winded gettysburg address of ego filled rubbish -

----------------- so you do agree with me now , so what are we actually disagreeing about

I was right, this ego thing is a desperate attempt to get yourself out of that hole you're digging. Top Tip, aint working

"How do I know whether I disagree with you or not Martial, you've not even said what I should be disagreeing about

If you're talking about what you and I debated about for several nights on this thread then we disagree. If it's the thing I never debated with you then it's probably safe to assume I agreed"

Too complex for you?