or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1185 comments are related to an article called:

England v India thread

Page 18 of 48

posted on 20/11/16

Indians reviewing via DRS

posted on 20/11/16

Reviews wasted

posted on 20/11/16

Dungeon cricket eh, I love it. England still hanging on, you never know. Stranger things have happened before.

I heard that India may consider Cobra as their future shirt sponsor.

I was referring to the lager brand not the SNAKE.

posted on 20/11/16

posted on 20/11/16

You can tell Hameed is a United fan with the way he's parked the bus

posted on 20/11/16

Oi Kash, leave Man Utd out of this.

posted on 20/11/16

Got the opening. The rest is just a formality now.

posted on 20/11/16

Did the Indian commentator on TMS really have to say that Hameed had "spukn" ?

posted on 20/11/16

Oh dear, there goes Hameed. looks like a collapse on the cards.

posted on 20/11/16

Hameed gets one that keeps very low. No blame attaches to the youngster. 75-1.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 20/11/16

Can't do anything about that, rotten luck

posted on 20/11/16

Still a full day's play to get through tomorrow. I think there will be plenty of DEMON'S in this pitch. A batsmen 's nightmare.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 20/11/16

Cook out, that's the game

posted on 20/11/16

Toodle pip

comment by Kav H (U19426)

posted on 20/11/16

Yesss Jaddu. Good persistent line. That might be the wicket that turns it for us.

posted on 20/11/16

Great comeback from India.

posted on 20/11/16

Great comeback? They were hardly on the verge of losing?

comment by Kav H (U19426)

posted on 20/11/16

Obvious to see India were frustrated for large parts of the day. Comeback is hardly the wrong word to use.

posted on 20/11/16

That's still a fantastic day for England.

England have a chance of a draw. Not a big one, but the batsmen will go out tomorrow with hope.

I thought there was virtually no chance of that last night.

England really blew this game in one session, but simce then have been excellent.

posted on 20/11/16

Kash, those 2 wickets were quite crucial imo. England could still have drawn this match if cook was around. And apart from the ball staying low, there is not much in there for the spinners. And our pacers are pretty useless in any conditions so can't expect them to be as effective as England's.

posted on 20/11/16

I think the Cook wicket was a massive massive moment. England can still rescue the game but it will be very difficult from here now.

comment by Kav H (U19426)

posted on 20/11/16

Broads height also really helped today. He was creatig all sorts of problems for the batsmen on this track by using the angle and varying the length. Added to the fact he was virtually on one leg it was a very valiant effort from him. Our seamers did not do the same and didn't really look threatening at all - too many balls on a short length especially Shami. Spinners will win it for us tomorrow if at all, the seamers don't look like doing much for us sadly.

posted on 20/11/16

Our seamers are a big question mark. Umesh yadav was bowling on 5th stump line. I think more than 80% of his balls were literally left alone. How hard is it for them to hit an off stump line consistently and especially when you have variable bounce.

comment by Kav H (U19426)

posted on 20/11/16

Exactly Viru. Nasser Hussein said it as well - Shami and Yadav are also very similar seamers in both pace and height. I'd love to see the percentage of balls England left alone - when the ball is keeping low on a surface like this, you have to get the batsman playing which they rarely did.

Kohli also needs to constantly following the ball with his field. Patience is vital in these conditions. So many times Cook edged to where a short leg would have snapped up the chance but he rarely had one in there. Improvement also needed there.

posted on 20/11/16

Yeah kohlis field placement have been very questionable. We didn't have a short leg when ashwin was bowling. We had lots of fielders on the boundary as well.

Page 18 of 48

Sign in if you want to comment