comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 47 seconds ago
Well I've just had a quick scan of yours and I've tools notes on the buzz element you provide. TIA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Id learn how to take constructive criticism to your articles rather that taking offence to criticism and making it personal.

comment by RB&W - Always a Legacy (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 47 seconds ago
Well I've just had a quick scan of yours and I've tools notes on the buzz element you provide. TIA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Id learn how to take constructive criticism to your articles rather that taking offence to criticism and making it personal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Genuinely, only joking. This article is full of holes. Took about five minutes.

comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 1 second ago
comment by RB&W - Always a Legacy (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 47 seconds ago
Well I've just had a quick scan of yours and I've tools notes on the buzz element you provide. TIA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Id learn how to take constructive criticism to your articles rather that taking offence to criticism and making it personal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Genuinely, only joking. This article is full of holes. Took about five minutes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyone think Danny Ings could be a shrewd signing for City if they can’t get Kane?

comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 5 minutes ago
Anyone think Danny Ings could be a shrewd signing for City if they can’t get Kane?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think they could do worse. Even if it was just one standout season and he fizzled off after, it wouldn't shock me, to be fair.

I don't know much about the current Norwich squad but we (Arsenal) definitely need to up our game big time if we're to stand a chance of finishing above them

I think all Utd need is a Bissouma and they are sorted

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 4 hours, 55 minutes ago
no surprises this year for top four. liverpool, man city, man united and chelsea. leicester and leeds will battle for fifth and then the rest.
if leeds small squad can stay healthy they may challenge top four. that's what the worlds best manager can do for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leeds

Man City: heart
Man Utd: brain
Chelsea: courage

To mind their own business.

In a very average Prem, it is going to be extremely hard for Spurs not to have a better season than last season. They surely will not drop as many points from winning positions again, just half of the 20 points dropped would see Spurs comfortably top four. Spurs will surprise a lot next season.

I can also see Liverpool dropping out of the top four, they seemed to have peaked a couple of seasons back, and a slow decline will now set in.

Of the others West Ham and Arsenal could be up or around top six again.

City - Kane
United - Pau Torres
Chelsea - Haaland
Leicester - Berardi

We need a midfielder. I like Bissouma a lot. Would be happy with him.

Think city will win it again but if Chelsea get Haaland then they might sneak it.

Who’s stumping up the £200M asking price for Kane tho?

comment by Automatic For The People Variant (U21889)
posted 3 minutes ago
Who’s stumping up the £200M asking price for Kane tho?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s what they need, not who they’ll get. I don’t think Kane moves this summer.

City need a world class forward. Kane would be the best option.

comment by Gareth The King Southgate (U10026)
posted 9 hours, 48 minutes ago
I think Torres will find it hard to kill it from the bench. But he should improve in his second season, a lot of players do when playing for Pep.

I don’t think Bernardo would be too big a loss. I’m thinking more Sterling and Cancelo, if the rumours of their departure are to be believed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Losing Cancelo would be a really big blow in terms of Pep’s tactical options. The way he used him last season as kind of an auxiliary DM in possession was genius, and Zinchenko can’t do the same job.

Knowing Pep though, he’d just conjure some other kind of impossible innovation out of nowhere to compensate.

If Haaland is 140-150m as rumoured, no way is Kane more than 125m. He is older, more injury prone and if he is ever going to win something the next move is his only chance. Haaland has time on his side and worth more.

Levy may want to keep Kane, and has the right to do so, whether the striker wants to stay and will fully commit may be another matter. Spurs have clearly indicated their ambition, or lack thereof, and Kane will judge for himself once the Benfica players start arriving.

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 11 minutes ago
If Haaland is 140-150m as rumoured, no way is Kane more than 125m. He is older, more injury prone and if he is ever going to win something the next move is his only chance. Haaland has time on his side and worth more.

Levy may want to keep Kane, and has the right to do so, whether the striker wants to stay and will fully commit may be another matter. Spurs have clearly indicated their ambition, or lack thereof, and Kane will judge for himself once the Benfica players start arriving.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What has Haaland done, that makes him better currently than Kane? Stop keep peddling the injury prone nonsense. Haaland has had one decent season, Kane has had half a dozen decent seasons, and is absolutely proven in the Prem.

Haaland as it stands is not worth more than 80 million, and then you are taking an almighty risk buying at that price.

Agree on Kane, I don't think it will be anywhere near £150m let alone above that.

All this chat about Levy but he's terrible in the market these days and I suspect wants the money anyway.

£100m plus add one would be my guess.

Man City: A CF (Haaland, Kane).

Man United: Sancho (already signed), Varane, a better holding midfielder.

Chelsea: A top CF (Haaland), a replacement for Thiago Silva (could be Christensen).

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 35 minutes ago
In a very average Prem, it is going to be extremely hard for Spurs not to have a better season than last season. They surely will not drop as many points from winning positions again, just half of the 20 points dropped would see Spurs comfortably top four. Spurs will surprise a lot next season.

I can also see Liverpool dropping out of the top four, they seemed to have peaked a couple of seasons back, and a slow decline will now set in.

Of the others West Ham and Arsenal could be up or around top six again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing is a shoe-in with the Premier League at all. There are no guarantees that Spurs will finish any higher next season really despite having Nuno and obviously good players.

I'll be shocked but not surprised if you don't have a better season this time around.

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 11 minutes ago
If Haaland is 140-150m as rumoured, no way is Kane more than 125m. He is older, more injury prone and if he is ever going to win something the next move is his only chance. Haaland has time on his side and worth more.

Levy may want to keep Kane, and has the right to do so, whether the striker wants to stay and will fully commit may be another matter. Spurs have clearly indicated their ambition, or lack thereof, and Kane will judge for himself once the Benfica players start arriving.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What has Haaland done, that makes him better currently than Kane? Stop keep peddling the injury prone nonsense. Haaland has had one decent season, Kane has had half a dozen decent seasons, and is absolutely proven in the Prem.

Haaland as it stands is not worth more than 80 million, and then you are taking an almighty risk buying at that price.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pathetic

What has Haaland done, that makes him better currently than Kane?
---------

He didn't say he's better, he said he's worth more because he is.

Since 2019, Haaland has got 57 goals in 59 appearances for both Salzburg and Dortmund.

Kane in the same period has 57 goals in 83 appearances for Spurs.

Haaland being significantly younger as well, his value is obviously going to be much higher and the stats show you that, over the last 2 seasons, you're getting a better goals-per-game striker with Haaland than Kane. As a loose analysis anyway.

Kane is a better player than Haaland as it stands but that in no way means he's worth more.

"Prediction: 4th and a semi final"



Actually not far off in terms of what you wrote though. If we can get Varane over the line we definitely still need to address the midfield.