comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 28 minutes ago
66.67 % for utd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paying off the refs and still sit in 13th place
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mental as bad as theyve been past 5 years and under him on VAR and as a ref higher win % than us
i joked we know who his mates supported who recorded n leaked it since the timing of it being leaked after he facked em over vs west ham on olivers instruction ofc.
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 1 minute ago
No, it’d be bias. He’d have to be doing more than that for it to be corruption too.
---------------------------------------------------------
Bias is forming an inaccurate & inconsistent opinion without considering all the facts or shutting your mind off to them. One form of corruption is acting on it.
I suppose if you wanna get very pedantic, if he held the view that every manager who gave him sh!t on the touchline is a c**t (this is quite common in modern football), then maybe it's not an anti-Klopp bias per say. But the fact he made a video specifically about Klopp? It's not great.
I will amend my comment to say it's not evidence, but he probably is biased
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has to be a reward more than just to annoy someone for it to be corruption. For it to be bias, there needs to be some evidence to show a difference in actual judgment given to decisions against Liverpool compared to others.
I’ve just had a quick look at the stats and nothing backs that up.
-------------------------------------------------
OK. I've never considered the idea corruption requires some form of material gain to be considered as such. To prove the presence of corruption yes, but it's about abuse of power. A referee who uses his position of authority to stick it to a club or manager he doesn't like would qualify on it's own based on my understanding of the term.
I just checked google's definition & it's somewhat in line with mine but does acknowledge a material gain aspect, so maybe I'm wrong.
"dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do get where you’re coming from, I just think considering the private benefit to be able to just be “I stitched that guy up and I feel good about it” is pushing it a fair bit and actually devalues the term.
whuts this aboot Liverpool bribin the refs?
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 7 hours, 47 minutes ago
They’re all competitions. Doesn’t matter if it’s Slot now, your point in this thread was that video being indicative of him not liking Liverpool too and brought up our win percentage under him as well. He’s reffed us 7 times and we’ve won all 7, he’s reffed you 6 times and you’re the club with the second highest win percentage with him refereeing, which is the question I asked.
Now personally I don’t think either is a big enough subset to judge but given you’re the one that brought us up I thought it pertinent to show he’s hardly been overly strict against you by any of the metrics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Melts trying so hard when City are football dopers and get help from refs season after season.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 11 hours, 35 minutes ago
They’re all competitions. Doesn’t matter if it’s Slot now, your point in this thread was that video being indicative of him not liking Liverpool too and brought up our win percentage under him as well. He’s reffed us 7 times and we’ve won all 7, he’s reffed you 6 times and you’re the club with the second highest win percentage with him refereeing, which is the question I asked.
Now personally I don’t think either is a big enough subset to judge but given you’re the one that brought us up I thought it pertinent to show he’s hardly been overly strict against you by any of the metrics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Refs that were paid by City's owners - 100%
Refs that were paid by Liverpool's owners - 0%
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
They got inspiration from when Liverpool fans kept Gerrard from going to Chelsea.
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
They got inspiration from when Liverpool fans kept Gerrard from going to Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United fans inspired by Liverpool fans?
You’re not doing very well here, Darren.
"Liverpool were [expletive]. [Expletive], absolute [expletive]. Aside from having a right pop at me when I reffed them against Burnley during lockdown, then he accused me of lying and then had a right [expletive] pop at me.
"I've got no interest in talking to someone who's just [expletive] arrogant. I do my best not to speak to him. Milner's alright.
"You can see me there with mask on, covid...social distancing. We're 10m apart. So yeah, my god. German [expletive], [expletive] me."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be good to hear a more detailed explanation from Mr Coote.
Was he saying 'Liverpool were sh*t' after a particularly poor performance by them, or was it a more general 'Liverpool were sh*t in the 90's/2000's, but they aren't particularly sh*t now' comment?
What was he accused of lying about by Klopp?
Was this questioning of his integrity in the match report so that it could be looked into further by his bosses?
Is he particularly wrong for calling Klopp a c*nt if he feels he's wrongly been accused of lying and then abused during the match by him?
If he gets sacked then I hope Klopp just posts a massive grinning selfie on Instagram with no captions or anything.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear, embarrassing for Darren.
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear, embarrassing for Darren.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But but but they only did it cause the Liverpool fans did it.
We have always been the standard bearers
They would never even have had a perch to look up to if it wasn't for us
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 45 minutes ago
If he gets sacked then I hope Klopp just posts a massive grinning selfie on Instagram with no captions or anything.
----------------------------------------------------
That'll be him opening his first Red Bull cheque.
He's part of the empire now. Wahahaha
comment by Michael Edwards FC 2.0 loading…{Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 11 hours, 35 minutes ago
They’re all competitions. Doesn’t matter if it’s Slot now, your point in this thread was that video being indicative of him not liking Liverpool too and brought up our win percentage under him as well. He’s reffed us 7 times and we’ve won all 7, he’s reffed you 6 times and you’re the club with the second highest win percentage with him refereeing, which is the question I asked.
Now personally I don’t think either is a big enough subset to judge but given you’re the one that brought us up I thought it pertinent to show he’s hardly been overly strict against you by any of the metrics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Refs that were paid by City's owners - 100%
Refs that were paid by Liverpool's owners - 0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have I stumbled onto Twitter by accident?
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear, embarrassing for Darren.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But but but they only did it cause the Liverpool fans did it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 15 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
Just out of interest, who is the club with the second highest win percentage for games he’s refereed for them after us…?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prob Utd from what i can see
city 8 games 8 wins
utd 7 wins 2 draws 1 loss
everton didnt do too bad under him either 9 wins 4d 3 losses.
considering hes a young ref and how bad everton and utd have been in the last 4 years too, prob speaks volumes
utd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was being slightly cheeky there, it’s Liverpool
https://www.whoscored.com/Referees/150/Show/David-Coote
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which doesn't mean a lot without context. Liverpool's win percentage dropped by 12.6% when Coote was involved in their games. Again context needed but certainly puts your percentage into perspective.
Indeed, I said the same thing later in the thread, that was the point.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/31689845/premier-league-ref-david-coote-snorts-white-powder/amp/
Coote is back with another scandal. He really crossed the line this time
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 5 minutes ago
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/31689845/premier-league-ref-david-coote-snorts-white-powder/amp/
Coote is back with another scandal. He really crossed the line this time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So he wasn't really a referee, just a lines man
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 5 minutes ago
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/31689845/premier-league-ref-david-coote-snorts-white-powder/amp/
Coote is back with another scandal. He really crossed the line this time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign in if you want to comment
David Coote
Page 10 of 11
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 11/11/24
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 28 minutes ago
66.67 % for utd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paying off the refs and still sit in 13th place
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mental as bad as theyve been past 5 years and under him on VAR and as a ref higher win % than us
i joked we know who his mates supported who recorded n leaked it since the timing of it being leaked after he facked em over vs west ham on olivers instruction ofc.
posted on 11/11/24
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 1 minute ago
No, it’d be bias. He’d have to be doing more than that for it to be corruption too.
---------------------------------------------------------
Bias is forming an inaccurate & inconsistent opinion without considering all the facts or shutting your mind off to them. One form of corruption is acting on it.
I suppose if you wanna get very pedantic, if he held the view that every manager who gave him sh!t on the touchline is a c**t (this is quite common in modern football), then maybe it's not an anti-Klopp bias per say. But the fact he made a video specifically about Klopp? It's not great.
I will amend my comment to say it's not evidence, but he probably is biased
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has to be a reward more than just to annoy someone for it to be corruption. For it to be bias, there needs to be some evidence to show a difference in actual judgment given to decisions against Liverpool compared to others.
I’ve just had a quick look at the stats and nothing backs that up.
-------------------------------------------------
OK. I've never considered the idea corruption requires some form of material gain to be considered as such. To prove the presence of corruption yes, but it's about abuse of power. A referee who uses his position of authority to stick it to a club or manager he doesn't like would qualify on it's own based on my understanding of the term.
I just checked google's definition & it's somewhat in line with mine but does acknowledge a material gain aspect, so maybe I'm wrong.
"dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power, typically involving bribery."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I do get where you’re coming from, I just think considering the private benefit to be able to just be “I stitched that guy up and I feel good about it” is pushing it a fair bit and actually devalues the term.
posted on 12/11/24
whuts this aboot Liverpool bribin the refs?
posted on 12/11/24
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 7 hours, 47 minutes ago
They’re all competitions. Doesn’t matter if it’s Slot now, your point in this thread was that video being indicative of him not liking Liverpool too and brought up our win percentage under him as well. He’s reffed us 7 times and we’ve won all 7, he’s reffed you 6 times and you’re the club with the second highest win percentage with him refereeing, which is the question I asked.
Now personally I don’t think either is a big enough subset to judge but given you’re the one that brought us up I thought it pertinent to show he’s hardly been overly strict against you by any of the metrics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Melts trying so hard when City are football dopers and get help from refs season after season.
posted on 12/11/24
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 11 hours, 35 minutes ago
They’re all competitions. Doesn’t matter if it’s Slot now, your point in this thread was that video being indicative of him not liking Liverpool too and brought up our win percentage under him as well. He’s reffed us 7 times and we’ve won all 7, he’s reffed you 6 times and you’re the club with the second highest win percentage with him refereeing, which is the question I asked.
Now personally I don’t think either is a big enough subset to judge but given you’re the one that brought us up I thought it pertinent to show he’s hardly been overly strict against you by any of the metrics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Refs that were paid by City's owners - 100%
Refs that were paid by Liverpool's owners - 0%
posted on 12/11/24
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
posted on 12/11/24
They got inspiration from when Liverpool fans kept Gerrard from going to Chelsea.
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
They got inspiration from when Liverpool fans kept Gerrard from going to Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United fans inspired by Liverpool fans?
You’re not doing very well here, Darren.
posted on 12/11/24
"Liverpool were [expletive]. [Expletive], absolute [expletive]. Aside from having a right pop at me when I reffed them against Burnley during lockdown, then he accused me of lying and then had a right [expletive] pop at me.
"I've got no interest in talking to someone who's just [expletive] arrogant. I do my best not to speak to him. Milner's alright.
"You can see me there with mask on, covid...social distancing. We're 10m apart. So yeah, my god. German [expletive], [expletive] me."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be good to hear a more detailed explanation from Mr Coote.
Was he saying 'Liverpool were sh*t' after a particularly poor performance by them, or was it a more general 'Liverpool were sh*t in the 90's/2000's, but they aren't particularly sh*t now' comment?
What was he accused of lying about by Klopp?
Was this questioning of his integrity in the match report so that it could be looked into further by his bosses?
Is he particularly wrong for calling Klopp a c*nt if he feels he's wrongly been accused of lying and then abused during the match by him?
posted on 12/11/24
If he gets sacked then I hope Klopp just posts a massive grinning selfie on Instagram with no captions or anything.
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear, embarrassing for Darren.
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear, embarrassing for Darren.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But but but they only did it cause the Liverpool fans did it.
posted on 12/11/24
We have always been the standard bearers
They would never even have had a perch to look up to if it wasn't for us
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 45 minutes ago
If he gets sacked then I hope Klopp just posts a massive grinning selfie on Instagram with no captions or anything.
----------------------------------------------------
That'll be him opening his first Red Bull cheque.
He's part of the empire now. Wahahaha
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Michael Edwards FC 2.0 loading…{Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 2 hours, 50 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 11 hours, 35 minutes ago
They’re all competitions. Doesn’t matter if it’s Slot now, your point in this thread was that video being indicative of him not liking Liverpool too and brought up our win percentage under him as well. He’s reffed us 7 times and we’ve won all 7, he’s reffed you 6 times and you’re the club with the second highest win percentage with him refereeing, which is the question I asked.
Now personally I don’t think either is a big enough subset to judge but given you’re the one that brought us up I thought it pertinent to show he’s hardly been overly strict against you by any of the metrics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Refs that were paid by City's owners - 100%
Refs that were paid by Liverpool's owners - 0%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have I stumbled onto Twitter by accident?
posted on 12/11/24
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Ruben The King Amorim Tim Tagi Dim (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
Liverpool don’t need to pay the refs, to be fair. The fear of death threats from their fans is enough to scare them into giving Liverpool every decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah cool
https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/soccer-dirty-tackle/hooded-man-utd-fans-rooneys-home-death-threat--soccer.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGBREYc2_nU8f09g85TrH2DQ4uo-fYH6EVEshcJbtjaw8TEzAw-Yn5HTpQ5lM5WNxovPFU39t4XOcXCV9KqEy4jbaD8zH2nLyvGJzWXsVauKfamfZtZ15nvjpwZz1msBE8jDw6i8Q94T9H4awtw-KVtD48KKUafpRk9DXMPmkEa8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear, embarrassing for Darren.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But but but they only did it cause the Liverpool fans did it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 12/11/24
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 15 hours, 53 minutes ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
Just out of interest, who is the club with the second highest win percentage for games he’s refereed for them after us…?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prob Utd from what i can see
city 8 games 8 wins
utd 7 wins 2 draws 1 loss
everton didnt do too bad under him either 9 wins 4d 3 losses.
considering hes a young ref and how bad everton and utd have been in the last 4 years too, prob speaks volumes
utd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was being slightly cheeky there, it’s Liverpool
https://www.whoscored.com/Referees/150/Show/David-Coote
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which doesn't mean a lot without context. Liverpool's win percentage dropped by 12.6% when Coote was involved in their games. Again context needed but certainly puts your percentage into perspective.
posted on 12/11/24
Indeed, I said the same thing later in the thread, that was the point.
posted on 13/11/24
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/31689845/premier-league-ref-david-coote-snorts-white-powder/amp/
Coote is back with another scandal. He really crossed the line this time
posted on 13/11/24
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 5 minutes ago
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/31689845/premier-league-ref-david-coote-snorts-white-powder/amp/
Coote is back with another scandal. He really crossed the line this time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 13/11/24
So he wasn't really a referee, just a lines man
posted on 13/11/24
comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 5 minutes ago
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/31689845/premier-league-ref-david-coote-snorts-white-powder/amp/
Coote is back with another scandal. He really crossed the line this time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 14/11/24
bessed. ref. ever.
Page 10 of 11
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11