There'sOnlyOneReds
He didn't call him 'negrito'. He asked him, "Por que negro" which means - 'why, Black?', in English.
==================
That makes it okay then.
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 4 minutes ago
There'sOnlyOneReds
He didn't call him 'negrito'. He asked him, "Por que negro" which means - 'why, Black?', in English.
==================
That makes it okay then.
----------------------------
You would think, wouldn't you? The FA didn't see it like that though.
I know, how weird of the FA to treat racism seriously eh?
'That makes it okay then'
OK or not is not the issue - it is not racism!!!
It it wasn't racism, what was it?
Racist abuse! Is it me or have I mentioned this?!
As we've discussed, racist abuse is racism - it cant be anything different. The words have the same meaning, it just depends in what way you approach a certain sentence.
As i said before, if a person causes vandalism, they are a vandal. There is no grey areas here.
comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 6 minutes ago
Racist abuse! Is it me or have I mentioned this?!
------------------------------
He's pulling you in mate, stop falling for it.
I think we're all being sent in circles to be honest, not just 'CutMeAndIBleedRed', but in typical "sheep" fashion, surprise surprise 'There'sOnlyOneReds' follows the 'Pool fan.
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 14 seconds ago
I think we're all being sent in circles to be honest, not just 'CutMeAndIBleedRed', but in typical "sheep" fashion, surprise surprise 'There'sOnlyOneReds' follows the 'Pool fan.
---------------------------------
Yes, it's a massive surprise when somebody who always trolls the Liverpool board looking for bites, finds that two people of the club he's attacking agree with each other, shock horror.
There'sOnlyOneReds,
You dont even read posts before responding most of the time. If you saw a man in a Liverpool shirt mugging an old lady you'd gormlessly help them out because they "must be in the right".
You're a sheep, fella. Plain & simple.
If you saw a man in a Liverpool shirt mugging an old lady you'd gormlessly help them out because they "must be in the right".
------------------------
What a stupid bloody comment!!
jenners
Its true though.
There'sOnlyOneReds's first comment on any article, where there is a non-Pool fan, is insulting them & telling them they know nothing.
No opinions, no reasonable debate, just go against the non-Pool fan.
Trust me, earlier he told me i know nothing about football, just because i said the gap between Barca & Chelsea had grown since they last played them.
In typical fashion, There'sOnlyOneReds disagreed with me without even readin the post, only to find the Chelsea fans ACTUALLY agreeing with me - which put him in his place AGAIN!
Good god are we still going on about this?
Were the Spurs fans being racist, towards Sol Campbell and Adebayor, or racially abusive?
Or was it both?
Anyway, i can see you're all playing the "followers game" now - so i'm outta here.
I dont do cyber bullies.
red_man23,
Seeing as there is a massive difference between the 2 ...you tell me.
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 1 minute ago
jenners
Its true though.
There'sOnlyOneReds's first comment on any article, where there is a non-Pool fan, is insulting them & telling them they know nothing.
No opinions, no reasonable debate, just go against the non-Pool fan.
Trust me, earlier he told me i know nothing about football, just because i said the gap between Barca & Chelsea had grown since they last played them.
------------------------------
Aww bless, he resorting to making stuff up and lying to make a point. That's when you know you've lost. Just face it, this particular WUM hasn't paid off, move on to the next one and stop whining. There are plenty of bites to be had elsewhere.
'As i said before, if a person causes vandalism, they are a vandal. There is no grey areas here.'
OMG!!! What do you think racially aggravated assault is?! Do you think that is just assault? Of course there are different levels! Answer this simple question - if you hit a woman are you sexist?!!!!
Try this one. If you break someone's window that is vandalism. You are a vandal.
If you break someone's window because they are black and you don't like black people that is vandalism but you are also a racist!
If you call someone a racist name because you don't like them - you are offensive
If you call someone a racist name because you don't like their race - you are a offensive racist!
Lying am i, There'sOnlyOneReds?
Here's the link:
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/98236
Enjoy the read.
Chicken
I don't know, do the fans hold the belief that anyone not of the same race and ethnicity are inferior to themselves?
Or were they over-stepping the mark at a heated football match and being racially abusive?
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 54 seconds ago
Lying am i, There'sOnlyOneReds?
Here's the link:
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/98236
Enjoy the read.
-------------------------------------
I know that's the link, it contains the content where I had to tell you two or three times that I didn't disagree with you, only that I can't take anything you say seriously.
I then went on to tell you that using your logic that a Chelsea fan must be right because he's knows more, you should leave the Liverpool board alone as we know more about our club, but your twisted logic only works one way, your way, doesn't it?
I also told you several times that I believe Chelsea would be a difficult game for Barcelona not because they are as good as they were in 2009 but because I believe Chelsea are the type of side Barca hate playing against.
Now if you choose to ignore all this and take from it, I didn't read your post and disagreed with you because you aren't a Liverpool fan, then that's your choice but the proof is all there in black and white sonny.
'Were the Spurs fans being racist, towards Sol Campbell and Adebayor, or racially abusive? Or was it both?'
I don't know - I don't know their intent. As I said, it is very hard to know someone's intent when they use racist language. However, when the person abuse is directed at and the governing body rule that someone is using racist language but is NOT a racist, then it is easier to tell the difference!
'Seeing as there is a massive difference between the 2 ...you tell me.' - Chicken
Direct quote from me: 'I agree, it's a very hard to identify between the two' - stop implying stuff to try to support your argument, it just makes you look silly!
red_man23
I don’t care who they are. If people are using racist language towards people to offend, then they are racially abusive(1), are racist(2) & are using racism(3). There is no differing between the lot. You cannot use points 1 & 2 & be any different to someone using 2 & 3.
There'sOnlyOneReds,
Backtracking since i provided the link, i see.
Chicken
Sticking 'ism' onto the end of a word doesn't make it comparable with racism.
Racism is a belief about another race. Similar to (not literally) Catholicism being a belief in the deity. If I say I believe in god once it doesn't make me a Catholic. But if I believe that god exists that does.
Do you see what I'm getting at?
Sign in if you want to comment
Diving
Page 7 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
posted on 16/3/12
There'sOnlyOneReds
He didn't call him 'negrito'. He asked him, "Por que negro" which means - 'why, Black?', in English.
==================
That makes it okay then.
posted on 16/3/12
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 4 minutes ago
There'sOnlyOneReds
He didn't call him 'negrito'. He asked him, "Por que negro" which means - 'why, Black?', in English.
==================
That makes it okay then.
----------------------------
You would think, wouldn't you? The FA didn't see it like that though.
posted on 16/3/12
I know, how weird of the FA to treat racism seriously eh?
posted on 16/3/12
'That makes it okay then'
OK or not is not the issue - it is not racism!!!
posted on 16/3/12
It it wasn't racism, what was it?
posted on 16/3/12
Racist abuse! Is it me or have I mentioned this?!
posted on 16/3/12
As we've discussed, racist abuse is racism - it cant be anything different. The words have the same meaning, it just depends in what way you approach a certain sentence.
As i said before, if a person causes vandalism, they are a vandal. There is no grey areas here.
posted on 16/3/12
comment by CutMeAndIBleedRed (U7593)
posted 6 minutes ago
Racist abuse! Is it me or have I mentioned this?!
------------------------------
He's pulling you in mate, stop falling for it.
posted on 16/3/12
I think we're all being sent in circles to be honest, not just 'CutMeAndIBleedRed', but in typical "sheep" fashion, surprise surprise 'There'sOnlyOneReds' follows the 'Pool fan.
posted on 16/3/12
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 14 seconds ago
I think we're all being sent in circles to be honest, not just 'CutMeAndIBleedRed', but in typical "sheep" fashion, surprise surprise 'There'sOnlyOneReds' follows the 'Pool fan.
---------------------------------
Yes, it's a massive surprise when somebody who always trolls the Liverpool board looking for bites, finds that two people of the club he's attacking agree with each other, shock horror.
posted on 16/3/12
There'sOnlyOneReds,
You dont even read posts before responding most of the time. If you saw a man in a Liverpool shirt mugging an old lady you'd gormlessly help them out because they "must be in the right".
You're a sheep, fella. Plain & simple.
posted on 16/3/12
If you saw a man in a Liverpool shirt mugging an old lady you'd gormlessly help them out because they "must be in the right".
------------------------
What a stupid bloody comment!!
posted on 16/3/12
jenners
Its true though.
There'sOnlyOneReds's first comment on any article, where there is a non-Pool fan, is insulting them & telling them they know nothing.
No opinions, no reasonable debate, just go against the non-Pool fan.
Trust me, earlier he told me i know nothing about football, just because i said the gap between Barca & Chelsea had grown since they last played them.
In typical fashion, There'sOnlyOneReds disagreed with me without even readin the post, only to find the Chelsea fans ACTUALLY agreeing with me - which put him in his place AGAIN!
posted on 16/3/12
Good god are we still going on about this?
Were the Spurs fans being racist, towards Sol Campbell and Adebayor, or racially abusive?
Or was it both?
posted on 16/3/12
Anyway, i can see you're all playing the "followers game" now - so i'm outta here.
I dont do cyber bullies.
posted on 16/3/12
red_man23,
Seeing as there is a massive difference between the 2 ...you tell me.
posted on 16/3/12
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 1 minute ago
jenners
Its true though.
There'sOnlyOneReds's first comment on any article, where there is a non-Pool fan, is insulting them & telling them they know nothing.
No opinions, no reasonable debate, just go against the non-Pool fan.
Trust me, earlier he told me i know nothing about football, just because i said the gap between Barca & Chelsea had grown since they last played them.
------------------------------
Aww bless, he resorting to making stuff up and lying to make a point. That's when you know you've lost. Just face it, this particular WUM hasn't paid off, move on to the next one and stop whining. There are plenty of bites to be had elsewhere.
posted on 16/3/12
'As i said before, if a person causes vandalism, they are a vandal. There is no grey areas here.'
OMG!!! What do you think racially aggravated assault is?! Do you think that is just assault? Of course there are different levels! Answer this simple question - if you hit a woman are you sexist?!!!!
Try this one. If you break someone's window that is vandalism. You are a vandal.
If you break someone's window because they are black and you don't like black people that is vandalism but you are also a racist!
If you call someone a racist name because you don't like them - you are offensive
If you call someone a racist name because you don't like their race - you are a offensive racist!
posted on 16/3/12
Lying am i, There'sOnlyOneReds?
Here's the link:
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/98236
Enjoy the read.
posted on 16/3/12
Chicken
I don't know, do the fans hold the belief that anyone not of the same race and ethnicity are inferior to themselves?
Or were they over-stepping the mark at a heated football match and being racially abusive?
posted on 16/3/12
comment by Chicken (on a Basketball) ©™ (U1043)
posted 54 seconds ago
Lying am i, There'sOnlyOneReds?
Here's the link:
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/98236
Enjoy the read.
-------------------------------------
I know that's the link, it contains the content where I had to tell you two or three times that I didn't disagree with you, only that I can't take anything you say seriously.
I then went on to tell you that using your logic that a Chelsea fan must be right because he's knows more, you should leave the Liverpool board alone as we know more about our club, but your twisted logic only works one way, your way, doesn't it?
I also told you several times that I believe Chelsea would be a difficult game for Barcelona not because they are as good as they were in 2009 but because I believe Chelsea are the type of side Barca hate playing against.
Now if you choose to ignore all this and take from it, I didn't read your post and disagreed with you because you aren't a Liverpool fan, then that's your choice but the proof is all there in black and white sonny.
posted on 16/3/12
'Were the Spurs fans being racist, towards Sol Campbell and Adebayor, or racially abusive? Or was it both?'
I don't know - I don't know their intent. As I said, it is very hard to know someone's intent when they use racist language. However, when the person abuse is directed at and the governing body rule that someone is using racist language but is NOT a racist, then it is easier to tell the difference!
'Seeing as there is a massive difference between the 2 ...you tell me.' - Chicken
Direct quote from me: 'I agree, it's a very hard to identify between the two' - stop implying stuff to try to support your argument, it just makes you look silly!
posted on 16/3/12
red_man23
I don’t care who they are. If people are using racist language towards people to offend, then they are racially abusive(1), are racist(2) & are using racism(3). There is no differing between the lot. You cannot use points 1 & 2 & be any different to someone using 2 & 3.
posted on 16/3/12
There'sOnlyOneReds,
Backtracking since i provided the link, i see.
posted on 16/3/12
Chicken
Sticking 'ism' onto the end of a word doesn't make it comparable with racism.
Racism is a belief about another race. Similar to (not literally) Catholicism being a belief in the deity. If I say I believe in god once it doesn't make me a Catholic. But if I believe that god exists that does.
Do you see what I'm getting at?
Page 7 of 12
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12