Brienne of Tarth looks like she'll break your valyrian steel
For me it's Shae and that chick who was Dany's love coach before she locked her in that Krath vault thing.
Two women who looked like p0rnstars (one actually was), and characters who'd pump like animals
comment by Devil D.A. (U6522)
posted 25 minutes ago
For me it's Shae and that chick who was Dany's love coach before she locked her in that Krath vault thing.
Two women who looked like p0rnstars (one actually was), and characters who'd pump like animals
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shae? Na, pretty ordinary, the other one was hot, dany, Sanasa, one of Ramsey Bolton’s temptresses and Margary Tyrell.
Shae was the former p0rnstar
Rob Stark's bird was decent aswell. Cracking body.
Regarding Dany's girl, there's a deleted scene from S2 showing her killing the Dothraki girl who was with Dany at the time. She's choking her with a silk scarf talking dirty af
comment by Devil D.A. (U6522)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
Regarding Dany's girl, there's a deleted scene from S2 showing her killing the Dothraki girl who was with Dany at the time. She's choking her with a silk scarf talking dirty af
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(gets out Game of Thrones Boxset and starts looking at the extras for deleted scenes)
I was kinda disappointed they added it (w@nk fodder aside lol). I liked the notion they she could've been manipulated, wasn't directly part of the double cross and was just naive.
It made Dany look really ruthless when she trapped her inside too, but no, she was absolutely right..... as always
That girl was in hollyoaks
Do people not realize that the shows and the books are 2 different storylines?
But the show did borrow heavily from the books though and you can't deny that the quality in writing has reduced since they passed the books.
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 20 minutes ago
Do people not realize that the shows and the books are 2 different storylines?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah and the post seson 4 storyline is w@nk compared to what came prior
I don’t understand why you watch it if you think it’s shiiit?
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 18 hours, 9 minutes ago
I don’t understand why you watch it if you think it’s shiiit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When a show reaches such a high number of viewers it wasnt going to please everyone (I remember the reaction a number of fans had to the last series of Breaking Bad). A lot will continue to watch the show due to the time they invested in it already
From what I have seen so far there are several trains of thought on the negativity (feel free to reply with more)
The change of direction from the show: Some are upset that the show seems to have treated the wights/long night as a hindrance to the game of thrones while the books are currently treating the game of thrones a hindrance to the threat of the wights/long night.
The last episode was majorly hyped and while it wasnt perfect a number of people were let down due to certain reasons (lighting/terrible military strategy/Aarya seemingly hiding in a tree and dropping in from nowhere/ etc etc)
Theres also the group of people who hate on the show as its the thing to do at the moment
whoever planned the start of the battle was devoid of logic, its abysmal upon a rewatch
The change of direction from the show: Some are upset that the show seems to have treated the wights/long night as a hindrance to the game of thrones while the books are currently treating the game of thrones a hindrance to the threat of the wights/long night.
-----------------------------------------------------
I was think something similar the other day. Just my impressions reading the reactions, I don't think people have much of a problem with them splitting the series in two halves - The Wights & Cersci. I think people have a problem with The Wights/TNK being portrayed as the lesser threat. If episodes 1-3 were dedicated to Cersci, her death and the iron throne and the walkers took episodes 4-6, I reckon they could've kept 'The Long Night' almost exactly how it was (with a few tweaks) and people would've been a lot more forgiving.
It would be nice if they were able to interweave both somehow but fans have become realistic about the quality of writing in recent years. The underling feeling I'm seeing is a perception that TNK was playing warm up act for a lesser villain (which I personally disagree with, Cersci's villainy as an all encompassing character destroys TNK in terms of appeal to me).
I don’t think they are done with the Night King at all. I mean he may be dead but I just think there is another twist to come when it comes to Bran and the dead. Too much left unexplained, him worging through the whole battle, the 5 minute stare with the Night King, the fact that the Nights Watch are on 999 lord commanders with Edd dead, and that it wouldn’t make sense for a 1000th lord commander if there are no more enemies beyond the wall (maybe reading too much into that but it would be annoying weird if they stopped at 999 lord commanders instead of 1000). I refuse to think the story with the WW just ends like that.
I don't think that's the problem at all. He was just too easily defeated. That's the problem.
Personally I enjoyed episode 3 but I didn't love it.
The issue for me was how the main characters were able to battle off the w/walkers with relative ease. In the previous 7 series we've been lead to believe that meeting a w/walker is practically a death sentence and killing just one is celebrated.
In the battle however they overran Winterfell and our heroes killed one after another after another...
It felt more like watching an Avengers film than GoT to me. There was very little suspense in the whole battle, not like Battle of the B'stards for example.
I enjoyed it as a spectacle but didn't love it as an episode.
I mentioned that spiral fire in the crypts after the battle signals something. Time will tell.
. I think people have a problem with The Wights/TNK being portrayed as the lesser threat. If episodes 1-3 were dedicated to Cersci, her death and the iron throne and the walkers took episodes 4-6, I reckon they could've kept 'The Long Night' almost exactly how it was (with a few tweaks) and people would've been a lot more forgiving.
----
Exactly how I feel. The show has been building up the white walkers and the dead for 7 seasons as essentially the end of the world unless we can out aside our differences and work together.
The very first scene in the show related to white walkers, Jon and Bran's entire plot line revolves around the white walkers, we're told the last long night lasted years and ravaged all of Westeros. Then it all ends after 1 battle with the walkers not even conquering 1 of the 7 kingdoms.
Jon, Dany etc have just fought the embodiment of death and won, and now we're supposed to believe Cersei is the bigger threat?
Would love it if Cersei is hiding in Dragonstone and blows up the whole of Kings Landing with wildfire.
Yep, I've thought that aswell. That look TNK gave him when Bran was staring him down was very interesting, couldn't read his reaction but it was almost like they were having a telepathic conversation. Also interesting how during the battle Bran conveniently worged to TNK just as he gave the command for the walkers to fall onto the trench, thus paving his path towards Bran.
There's very more to Bran than meets the eye, and when in doubt dealing with lazy writing always assume those characters are bad guys. If Bran becomes the real threat before the end it won't surprise me at all.
Tbh, I don't see it as TNK was less important than Cersei - I see it as evening up the odds.
If Jon and Dany went to fight Cersei first then they'd have walked from her army in all probability. If nothing else, a decimated Jon & Dany army would lose to the TNK so they'd have needed to come out relatively unscathed to make the next battle in any way even.
What we have now is a victorious but hugely depleted Jon and Dany going up to face a untouched Cersei army. It makes the battles and outcome a lot less certain imo. Well, maybe not the outcome but certainly the path and the price to be paid.
I think they had to do it this way around.
Sign in if you want to comment
GoT final season
Page 11 of 33
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 30/4/19
Brienne of Tarth looks like she'll break your valyrian steel
posted on 30/4/19
It would be worth it
posted on 30/4/19
For me it's Shae and that chick who was Dany's love coach before she locked her in that Krath vault thing.
Two women who looked like p0rnstars (one actually was), and characters who'd pump like animals
posted on 30/4/19
comment by Devil D.A. (U6522)
posted 25 minutes ago
For me it's Shae and that chick who was Dany's love coach before she locked her in that Krath vault thing.
Two women who looked like p0rnstars (one actually was), and characters who'd pump like animals
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shae? Na, pretty ordinary, the other one was hot, dany, Sanasa, one of Ramsey Bolton’s temptresses and Margary Tyrell.
posted on 30/4/19
Shae was the former p0rnstar
Rob Stark's bird was decent aswell. Cracking body.
posted on 30/4/19
Regarding Dany's girl, there's a deleted scene from S2 showing her killing the Dothraki girl who was with Dany at the time. She's choking her with a silk scarf talking dirty af
posted on 2/5/19
comment by Devil D.A. (U6522)
posted 1 day, 13 hours ago
Regarding Dany's girl, there's a deleted scene from S2 showing her killing the Dothraki girl who was with Dany at the time. She's choking her with a silk scarf talking dirty af
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(gets out Game of Thrones Boxset and starts looking at the extras for deleted scenes)
posted on 2/5/19
I was kinda disappointed they added it (w@nk fodder aside lol). I liked the notion they she could've been manipulated, wasn't directly part of the double cross and was just naive.
It made Dany look really ruthless when she trapped her inside too, but no, she was absolutely right..... as always
posted on 2/5/19
That girl was in hollyoaks
posted on 2/5/19
Do people not realize that the shows and the books are 2 different storylines?
posted on 2/5/19
But the show did borrow heavily from the books though and you can't deny that the quality in writing has reduced since they passed the books.
posted on 2/5/19
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 20 minutes ago
Do people not realize that the shows and the books are 2 different storylines?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah and the post seson 4 storyline is w@nk compared to what came prior
posted on 2/5/19
I don’t understand why you watch it if you think it’s shiiit?
posted on 3/5/19
comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 18 hours, 9 minutes ago
I don’t understand why you watch it if you think it’s shiiit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When a show reaches such a high number of viewers it wasnt going to please everyone (I remember the reaction a number of fans had to the last series of Breaking Bad). A lot will continue to watch the show due to the time they invested in it already
From what I have seen so far there are several trains of thought on the negativity (feel free to reply with more)
The change of direction from the show: Some are upset that the show seems to have treated the wights/long night as a hindrance to the game of thrones while the books are currently treating the game of thrones a hindrance to the threat of the wights/long night.
The last episode was majorly hyped and while it wasnt perfect a number of people were let down due to certain reasons (lighting/terrible military strategy/Aarya seemingly hiding in a tree and dropping in from nowhere/ etc etc)
Theres also the group of people who hate on the show as its the thing to do at the moment
posted on 3/5/19
whoever planned the start of the battle was devoid of logic, its abysmal upon a rewatch
posted on 3/5/19
The change of direction from the show: Some are upset that the show seems to have treated the wights/long night as a hindrance to the game of thrones while the books are currently treating the game of thrones a hindrance to the threat of the wights/long night.
-----------------------------------------------------
I was think something similar the other day. Just my impressions reading the reactions, I don't think people have much of a problem with them splitting the series in two halves - The Wights & Cersci. I think people have a problem with The Wights/TNK being portrayed as the lesser threat. If episodes 1-3 were dedicated to Cersci, her death and the iron throne and the walkers took episodes 4-6, I reckon they could've kept 'The Long Night' almost exactly how it was (with a few tweaks) and people would've been a lot more forgiving.
It would be nice if they were able to interweave both somehow but fans have become realistic about the quality of writing in recent years. The underling feeling I'm seeing is a perception that TNK was playing warm up act for a lesser villain (which I personally disagree with, Cersci's villainy as an all encompassing character destroys TNK in terms of appeal to me).
posted on 3/5/19
I don’t think they are done with the Night King at all. I mean he may be dead but I just think there is another twist to come when it comes to Bran and the dead. Too much left unexplained, him worging through the whole battle, the 5 minute stare with the Night King, the fact that the Nights Watch are on 999 lord commanders with Edd dead, and that it wouldn’t make sense for a 1000th lord commander if there are no more enemies beyond the wall (maybe reading too much into that but it would be annoying weird if they stopped at 999 lord commanders instead of 1000). I refuse to think the story with the WW just ends like that.
posted on 3/5/19
I don't think that's the problem at all. He was just too easily defeated. That's the problem.
posted on 3/5/19
Personally I enjoyed episode 3 but I didn't love it.
The issue for me was how the main characters were able to battle off the w/walkers with relative ease. In the previous 7 series we've been lead to believe that meeting a w/walker is practically a death sentence and killing just one is celebrated.
In the battle however they overran Winterfell and our heroes killed one after another after another...
It felt more like watching an Avengers film than GoT to me. There was very little suspense in the whole battle, not like Battle of the B'stards for example.
I enjoyed it as a spectacle but didn't love it as an episode.
posted on 3/5/19
I mentioned that spiral fire in the crypts after the battle signals something. Time will tell.
posted on 3/5/19
. I think people have a problem with The Wights/TNK being portrayed as the lesser threat. If episodes 1-3 were dedicated to Cersci, her death and the iron throne and the walkers took episodes 4-6, I reckon they could've kept 'The Long Night' almost exactly how it was (with a few tweaks) and people would've been a lot more forgiving.
----
Exactly how I feel. The show has been building up the white walkers and the dead for 7 seasons as essentially the end of the world unless we can out aside our differences and work together.
The very first scene in the show related to white walkers, Jon and Bran's entire plot line revolves around the white walkers, we're told the last long night lasted years and ravaged all of Westeros. Then it all ends after 1 battle with the walkers not even conquering 1 of the 7 kingdoms.
Jon, Dany etc have just fought the embodiment of death and won, and now we're supposed to believe Cersei is the bigger threat?
posted on 3/5/19
Would love it if Cersei is hiding in Dragonstone and blows up the whole of Kings Landing with wildfire.
posted on 3/5/19
Yep, I've thought that aswell. That look TNK gave him when Bran was staring him down was very interesting, couldn't read his reaction but it was almost like they were having a telepathic conversation. Also interesting how during the battle Bran conveniently worged to TNK just as he gave the command for the walkers to fall onto the trench, thus paving his path towards Bran.
There's very more to Bran than meets the eye, and when in doubt dealing with lazy writing always assume those characters are bad guys. If Bran becomes the real threat before the end it won't surprise me at all.
posted on 3/5/19
That reply was to Bats
posted on 3/5/19
Tbh, I don't see it as TNK was less important than Cersei - I see it as evening up the odds.
If Jon and Dany went to fight Cersei first then they'd have walked from her army in all probability. If nothing else, a decimated Jon & Dany army would lose to the TNK so they'd have needed to come out relatively unscathed to make the next battle in any way even.
What we have now is a victorious but hugely depleted Jon and Dany going up to face a untouched Cersei army. It makes the battles and outcome a lot less certain imo. Well, maybe not the outcome but certainly the path and the price to be paid.
I think they had to do it this way around.
Page 11 of 33
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16