comment by RB&W (U21434)
posted 32 seconds ago
why do you write "united" like this by the way? it's something a 12 year old would come up with, but then immediately delete because it was too cringeworthy.
++

It's as bad as calling City, 'Citeh'

As we know it's now pronounced, 'Cheaty'
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe if you live in the midlands

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Jim Lahey (U22183)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can someone explain to the dim amongst us what the fack time barred even means
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you remember when you refused to pay a credit card bill?

then 5 years ago the debt collectors couldn't come after you anymore

thats statute barred
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think it’s 7 before it’s wiped from your credit record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no idea, I am not from Liverpool.

sorry couldn't resist.

this whole thread finding myself on the side of pool fans has made me feel very strange

comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 45 seconds ago
Can someone explain to the dim amongst us what the fack time barred even means
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not a lawyer but a lot of evidence has a statutory period. So If I cheated a company, for example and the bring up a case against me the evidence has to be within the statutory period or its considered null/expired and the case can even be dismissed on that basis alone

Makes sense that you can't go after a club if it was 5 years old. We all know that only what a club has spent in the last 5 years has any relevance whatsoever to their success as a football team

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 12 seconds ago
Henry Winter @henrywinter
If Uefa could see that "many of the alleged breaches were time-barred due to the 5-year time period", why on earth did it bring/fight the case? Investigate/charge earlier. #mcfc

A wise question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I imagine the reason they didn't bring the charge earlier was because they were unaware of the evidence, which only came out through the leak last autumn.

I agree that it seeks stupid for them to blindly charge through with it if it was outside the statute of limitations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just copied this:

So in 20 months since Der Spiegel published "leaks" of a few City documents, the CFCB found a "serious breach" and imposed a 2 year Champions League ban, CAS has now quashed it, but there is very little detail to explain it all.

CAS promise a full judgment "in a few days."

comment by Jim Lahey (U22183)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Jim Lahey (U22183)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can someone explain to the dim amongst us what the fack time barred even means
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you remember when you refused to pay a credit card bill?

then 5 years ago the debt collectors couldn't come after you anymore

thats statute barred
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think it’s 7 before it’s wiped from your credit record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no idea, I am not from Liverpool.

sorry couldn't resist.

this whole thread finding myself on the side of pool fans has made me feel very strange
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Youarse

“I recently discovered in Spain if a murder happened 20 years ago and the murderer is caught by then they don’t get punished. Bonkers.”

Because you watched that garbage White Lines?

Seems very naive if UEFA where charging them with offences outside of the relevant timeframe.

Also, surely if a club can stall / not cooperate and take the lesser punishment to avoid a ban then everyone would / will do it

Scousers know exactly about time barred clauses when it comes to financial matters.

Yeah Bean so it’s BS?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

RIP to the families of those who dared challenege the oil murderers

comment by RB&W (U21434)
posted 22 seconds ago
Scousers know exactly about time barred clauses when it comes to financial matters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mancs are too busy sniffing wheelie bins to bother themselves with financial matters

comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted 1 minute ago
Makes sense that you can't go after a club if it was 5 years old. We all know that only what a club has spent in the last 5 years has any relevance whatsoever to their success as a football team
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can go after them after five years, you can’t go after someone that you’ve already sanctioned as it’s that that is time barred. Uefa knew that, they’ve been pulled up on it before.

The allegations though were covering years that weren’t timebarred too, which CAS have also overturned.

Chel ski is - pointing out they are an empty oil club just like City

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by red_evils (U19878)
posted 21 seconds ago
I felt for the genuine MC fans. They just found out that everything they were sold was a dream. Now they cannot go and brag about the titles with other fans. Even if they win CL this year, in the mind there will always be something wrong about it.
I don't really care about if they get ban or not. In fact I'd be unhappy if my club get to CL in 5th spot. So yes, celebrate if you like. You broke the rules, spending more than you were allowed to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We’ve just found out literally the opposite though, why would we be feeling as though the verdict was upheld when it’s been overturned?!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand the verdict. Doesn't mean you didn't do it. Actually you (MC fans) are the real victim of this scam

comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah Beanso it’s BS?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No idea, couldn’t hack watching it after a couple of episodes not even ar5ed finding out who killed him 😂

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RB&W (U21434)
posted 22 seconds ago
Scousers know exactly about time barred clauses when it comes to financial matters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mancs are too busy sniffing wheelie bins to bother themselves with financial matters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ah yes that well known term for Macs...bin dippers

Considering the cast were mostly southerners I thought they got the Manc accents bang on

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by ttliv87 English, European and World Champions (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)

And who's to say Yoonited won't finish 5th anyway?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why do you write "united" like this by the way? it's something a 12 year old would come up with, but then immediately delete because it was too cringeworthy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mousers
Chelski
Yoonited
Spudds
Citeh

All should be banned from use, how are any of them insults.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never quite got this myself. Sounds like the kind of thing you might occassionally hear on a primary school play ground

Having said that Man cheaty does have a nice ring to it

comment by KingKenny (U1961)
posted 1 minute ago
Chel ski is - pointing out they are an empty oil club just like City
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Say what you like if it makes you feel better. But I was there when Aguero scored in 2012 and it was the opposite of empty. Up there with the first time you do lsd or have sexx, and I’m sure Chelsea fans will tell you similar when they won the champs league that year

I know a 58 year old man who refers to United as 'm@nure' every time he mentions them.

I think people who do stuff like that probably voted for Brexit.

What I don't understand is how it went from 2 year ban and £30m fine to just a £10m fine upon appeal, that's quite a big difference in punishment.

comment by Jim Lahey (U22183)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RB&W (U21434)
posted 22 seconds ago
Scousers know exactly about time barred clauses when it comes to financial matters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mancs are too busy sniffing wheelie bins to bother themselves with financial matters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ah yes that well known term for Macs...bin dippers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because that’s what I said

Jim’s been on it early, sniff sniff